Veto this trade? WHIR

[guyincognito]

I am always of the opinion that trades should never be vetoed, unless there is obvious signs of collusion. Just because it seems lopsided or unfair isn't grounds for a veto. People make stupid trades all the time. Either it's because someone is inexperienced, or they just value certain players differently then the rest of us, but you can't penalize someone for making a "great trade" for them just because you don't like it, or more in most cases, because you didn't think of taking advantage of the other guy first.
That said, neither of these deals are vetoable in my opinion regardless.

Help me?: viewtopic.php?t=389647

[afern401]

Im not sure if this is helpful but I feel that unless foul play i.e. collusion is involved a trade shouldnt be veto'd. If both managers are happy with the deal then it should be allowed.

Lend a hand with mine?

viewtopic.php?t=389583

[metsfan12]

I agree with what most others said, the first trade seems completely fine to me and the 2nd one looks a little off but not horribly enough to veto.


help please:
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=389634

[Bobby B 11]

i think both trades are alright.