Hank Blalock or Mike Lowell?

[Howie]

Right now I'm using Hank Blalock at 3B as a fill-in for A-Ram, but someone just dropped Mike Lowell. Should I drop Blalock for Lowell or hang onto Blalock?

10 team h2h, 6x6 (standard cats plus ops and hr allowed)

c - v. martinez
1b - m. cabrera
2b - cano
3b - blalock
ss - jeter
of - beltran
of - holliday
of - abreu
util - hart
util - helton
bench - konerko

dl - a. ramirez
dl - dukes

sp - halladay
sp - lackey
sp - kershaw
rp - lidge
rp - fuentes
rp - m. gonzalez
p - street
p - j. cruz
bench - bj ryan
bench - lilly
bench - kazmir
bench - harang

[yanks0826]

I am not a big Lowell fan, so I say that you should stay put.

Help me?

viewtopic.php?t=386369

[sigriffey]

Hang onto Blalock for the power numbers... Lowell might not be as good in the second half.

[PointNo1]

Not a huge difference, but i would prob lean towards lowell if you have enough moves to spare.

[Slayer Rules]

They're both fragile - I lean toward Lowell, but I honestly don't expect either of them to avoid multiple trips to the DL this season.

[jake_twothousandfive]

I would make the switch. After a hot start, Blalock is only hitting .203 this month. Lowell is a much more consistent and reliable option, both in terms of health and production.

Thanks for the help with mine.

[coma]

I would roll with Lowell. Blalock has really tailed off lately. Like Lowell's avg and he should have good power and RBI numbers in Boston's lineup.

Help?
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=386341