In most cases I agree with "No Collusion, No Veto" but the one exception I make is if the guy on the bad end is a complete amateur, doesn't know any better, doesn't care, etc. In my opinion, it's not fair for a lopsided trade to upset the competitive balance of the league just because of one bad manager. Does the guy getting Young fall under that category? If so, then I think a veto is warranted. If he's an established manager, has some credibility, has made generally smart moves in the past, then you have to let it pass.