AM I WRONG....?

[the603s]

12team, roto 6x6(OPS & QS), 5 Keeper

WERTH/FUENTES for BELTRAN-------was vetoed

JD DREW/LIDGE/PORCELLO for BELTRAN/J.JOHNSON------------is pending

i was trading werth/fuentes for beltran and it got vetoed. the kid needed a closer bad, he had rodney as his best, and fuentes was my best. the trade was vetoed and dubbed "unfair, a top 10 player for werth and fuentes who's not that good"....

my question is am i wrong for thinking that the 2nd trade is ridiculousy, and that the 1st trade is WAY better than the 2nd? i cant tell if i am being biased, are both trades bad?

[hett2333]

Why was your deal denied? I think it was a fair trade, to be honest this isn't the type of league I would be apart of. Unless you can prove cheating is taking place, deals should not be vetoed.

viewtopic.php?t=380427

[Neboguy]

Both looks fair to me, with you getting a better deal in the 2nd. Nice Trade

[ayebatter]

Both looks fair to me, with you getting a better deal in the 2nd. Nice Trade

I believe his was the 1st deal, the one that was veto'd, hence his post, and it was a fair deal IMO.

[Neboguy]

Both looks fair to me, with you getting a better deal in the 2nd. Nice Trade

I believe his was the 1st deal, the one that was veto'd, hence his post, and it was a fair deal IMO.

He didn't specify if the 2nd was his or not. Maybe read the entire post and not assume?

[the603s]

Both looks fair to me, with you getting a better deal in the 2nd. Nice Trade

I believe his was the 1st deal, the one that was veto'd, hence his post, and it was a fair deal IMO.

He didn't specify if the 2nd was his or not. Maybe read the entire post and not assume?

ayebatter is correct- the second trade was NOT mine. and for the record, it got vetoed by the time i finished this topic.