Jeter for Webb??

[Tommy John]

This is a trade that is going through my league, wondering if it is bad enough to be rejected. Normal 5x5

Brandon Webb/Clint Barmes for Anibal Sanchez/Derek Jeter

I don't think the Jeter side is giving up enough talent, but I don't know if it is bad enough to veto or not. Any thoughts would be appreciated, I will help in return.

[Big League Chew]

I don't like the idea of vetoing even though I agree that this trade is a little lopsided. However, sometimes guys need specific positions, and want a guy like Jeter. If it seems like there is a reoccurring theme of bad trades from this same guy then I would ask him to leave the league after this year.

[Hit Factory]

Thanks for the help with mine! I don't think the trade should be vetoed, however the owner of Webb must be really down on him lol.

[Freebird27]

Webb is the classic buy low candidate right now, and that is all that I think it going on here. The Webb owner could be trying to get whatever value he can out of him for fear of a more severe injury coming out (whenever ya hear DR Andrews name you get nervous).

I may even do this deal right now if I had a nice rotation and a hole at SS,probably not but maybe. Bottom line is this deal should not be vetoed.

[Rance Mulliniks]

No need to veto. Webb is a good pickup for the Jeter owner, but looks alright to me.

[hawaiistfball]

With Webb and Dr. Andrews in the same sentence, he is probably thinking to at least get something for him if he is done for the season. If he has a strong pitiching staff, he may just want to fill the hole of SS on his roster. It is hard to tell without the teams posted. I would not veto this trade.

viewtopic.php?t=378753

[jmcampbe11]

Bad trade, but doesn't merit a veto. Vetos should be reserved for extreme cases or if cheating/collusion is suspected.

Can you return the favor plz - viewtopic.php?t=378755

[labardo31]

agreed, not worthy of a veto...just a bunch of smack talk bashing the guy who is dealing webb.