hamels trade WHIR

[fierro33]

i have 2 options:

give :

figgins/papelbon for hamels

or

ellsbury/papelbon for hamels/ibanez


if i did the first trade i would have to pick up mora to replace figgins

should i do either trade?


10 team h2h 5x5 non keeper

C Ramon hernandez
1b Carlos pena
2b Brandon phillips
3b alex Rodriguez
ss jose reyes
OF josh hamilton
OF Manny Ramirez
OF Jacoby Ellsbury
Util vernon wells
bench
Chris B young
lastings millege
chone figgins

Pitching

AJ Burnett
Scott Baker
kevin Slowey
Randy johnson
hiroki kuroda

Papelbon
nathan
soria
bj ryan
morrow
capps
francisco
qualls

[cranfire87]

I would do the 2nd one, you still would have figgins to replace the loss in SBs and you would get Ibanez who should have a pretty good year in Philly

please help
viewtopic.php?t=375432

[The Artful Dodger]

I like the first trade better but I think it's because you're actually giving less than you are in the second. Having Figgins cover third, let alone Mora, is a buzzkill, but you'd also have less of an outfield jam with the first one. Needless to say, you have more than enough saves even without Papelbon.

That said, I'd try shopping Milledge around, ideally for another SP.