Wang or Kershaw????? - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Injuries & Player Updates

Wang or Kershaw?????

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Wang or Kershaw?????

Postby kingman33 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:53 am

I currently have Kershaw but Wang is available on the waiver????
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor

User avatar

Posts: 35
Joined: 30 May 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Wang or Kershaw?????

Postby Pogotheostrich » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:20 am

I'd rather have Kershaw.
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe WriterMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyePick 3 Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 21512
(Past Year: 453)
Joined: 9 Dec 2002
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: St. Louis

Re: Wang or Kershaw?????

Postby LostInTheBoom » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:30 pm

I'd pencil Wang in for an ERA between 3.5 and 4 and 15+ wins. His past injuries have been fluky and are not long-term problems. His strikeouts and K/BB ratio are pretty underwhelming however.

Kershaw certainly offers more upside and significantly more strikeouts but I suspect he will be inconsistent. It depends on what you are looking for out of this roster spot...
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor

Posts: 58
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Home Cafe: Baseball

Return to Injuries & Player Updates

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues

Today's Games
Thursday, Apr. 17
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Atlanta at Philadelphia
(1:05 pm)
Cleveland at Detroit
(1:08 pm)
Toronto at Minnesota
(1:10 pm)
Seattle at Texas
(2:05 pm)
LA Dodgers at San Francisco
(3:45 pm)
Colorado at San Diego
(6:40 pm)
Milwaukee at Pittsburgh
(7:05 pm)
St. Louis at Washington
(7:05 pm)
NY Yankees at Tampa Bay
(7:10 pm)
Boston at Chi White Sox
(8:10 pm)
Kansas City at Houston
(8:10 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact