Is This Trade Going to Get Vetoed?

[rasto21585]

Team A gets: hanley ramirez, matt kemp, joey votto, evan longoria, dan haren, chad billingsley

Team B gets: ian kinsler, adrian gonzalez, carl crawford, vlad guerrero, jj hardy, felix hernandez, yovanni gallardo, derek lowe

[dave knight]

I'd definitely rather have Side A, but it might not be an overtly unbalanced deal so I'm not sure what your leaguemates would do. Cross your fingers.

viewtopic.php?t=372716

[mac-unit]

the talent seems even enough but it may get veto'd just because there are so many players involved

[Kimbos Beard]

It all depends on the league, but this has trouble written all over it.

I assume this is not a keeper, if so a 16 player trade before the seasons starts is unusual and massive enough to spark managers anger/inquiry. On top of that A is clearly getting the better side. Thats a bad combonation.

[WyldStallyn]

why would anyone do a trade this big? team A looks to be getting the better players. i wouldnt be surprised if it gets voted down

[Dislexic Irishman]

Team A gets: hanley ramirez, matt kemp, joey votto, evan longoria, dan haren, chad billingsley

Team B gets: ian kinsler, adrian gonzalez, carl crawford, vlad guerrero, jj hardy, felix hernandez, yovanni gallardo, derek lowe

I generally don't vote against trades but I would probably veto this.. Just too many players and too one sided.

Hanley >> Kinsler
Longoria > Crawford
Kemp > Vlad
Votto < Gonzo - barely
Haren > Felix
Billingsley > Gallardo
Hardy/Lowe.. eh

[rasto21585]

what would make this trade nonvetoable then? Like give me an example.

[Manfred]

woudl ratehr side A, btu don;t think ti's vetoable. Though. I'm a believer in allowign all trades unless there is collusion.