Who's taking Rollins in first round?

[dmbjeff]

would taking Rollins at #11 then Utley on the turn(or vice versa) be a good strategy?

yes! that would be golden. i dont know who you'd grab first tho. i guess it depends on who you think has a better shot at comin back. or who you'd rather have first and foremost. i do think 2b is deeper than ss this yr so there is that. go rollins and then if utley is gone you can grab a good power bat.

this is a no brainer. you take rollins first. after rollins, the next best SS shouldn't be picked until 50th overall. the next best 2B after utley is kinsler who is top 20 at worst. so yeah....rollins and utley or rollins and kinsler would be amazing and in such, sureing up 2 of the weaker positions in fantasy.

[abc11435]

If all the other SS suck except Hanley and Rollins, doesn't that mean 10 other teams will have a equally bad SS? Then why would I want to invest a 1st round pick in someone who puts up only above avg numbers? I'm referring to Rollins and not Hanley of course...

At any given draft, I see at least 8 other guys I'd rather have when someone grabs Rollins.