Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by mekman21 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:24 pm
There's a trade I'm deciding if I should veto or not in my league...it is:
Lincecum, Chipper Jones, James Loney for David Wright and Matt Kemp
should I veto? I don't like it
-
mekman21
- Little League Legend

- Posts: 6
- Joined: 19 Sep 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
by Kimbos Beard » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:27 pm
Why don't you like it?
-
Kimbos Beard
- Major League Manager



- Posts: 2063
- (Past Year: 397)
- Joined: 13 Mar 2008
- Bases this season: 1,198
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by mekman21 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:28 pm
is it fair?
-
mekman21
- Little League Legend

- Posts: 6
- Joined: 19 Sep 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
by MadDog36 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:31 pm
that trade needs to be allowed. There is no way that is vetoable.
Lincey a top starter packaged with a slightly lesser 3b but still quality player makes that part a wash. An upside 1b for an upside OF, wash out (kemp wins that, but its close enough). If you vetoed that I would quit.
The best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be!
-
MadDog36
- Hall of Fame Hero





- Posts: 13463
- (Past Year: 2756)
- Joined: 1 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 7,407
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: NC
by mekman21 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:39 pm
any one else? WHIR
-
mekman21
- Little League Legend

- Posts: 6
- Joined: 19 Sep 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
by eric31216 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:40 pm
vetoing just b/c you dont like it is bad sportsmanship
viewtopic.php?t=368742 help plz
-
eric31216
- College Coach

- Posts: 243
- (Past Year: 4)
- Joined: 20 Aug 2007
- Bases this season: 8
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Tenacious D-Store » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:41 pm
It doesn't even look unbalanced to me.
-
Tenacious D-Store
- Major League Manager



- Posts: 1900
- Joined: 8 Apr 2007
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Elsy » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:44 pm
It's a trade that has to be allowed. There doesn't seem to be any collusion or anything like that. Plus the fact that it is a fair trade.
-
Elsy
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 2114
- (Past Year: 59)
- Joined: 7 Nov 2006
- Bases this season: 121
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by TheBull » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:50 pm
no way its vetoable...although whoever is getting Lincecum/Loney/Chipper is getting fleeced. Wright has more value than all 3 of them combined

-
TheBull
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 651
- (Past Year: 115)
- Joined: 7 Jan 2007
- Bases this season: 138
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Northlake, TX
by talan37 » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:54 pm
Looks fine to me, and I am generally a stickler for fair trades. Loney is basically a throw in, and you have lince and chipper for wright and kemp. Chipper and kemp are pretty close, and wright and lince are very close(assuming you want pitching). Loney makes it a little more fair, if hes needed anyways.
Definitely a fair trade.
-
talan37
- College Coach



- Posts: 316
- Joined: 13 Apr 2007
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: baegames, CisedForBryce, erjohnson1, Seanyfever, sn267537, twistedude and 8 guests