I agree with Chris --- Id suggest that maybe we let trades go through if 3 or 4 managers agree that its a fair deal. I think that this is a more positive way to address the issue. Rather than vetoing, 'allowing' so to speak. I think we're all experienced enough here to know a horribly lopsided deal when we see it.
Invictus - great member name
.... "I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul."
I'm not sure anybody has to comment on or post in a thread that they agree that a trade was fair for it to go through. But if there is suspected collusion (which will, most likely, not happen), then the issue can be raised.