RocketsDWM wrote:In accordance with this league rule:
- A player can only be tagged as a Rookie Keeper™ once, then they have to become one of your 10 keepers the next year
Pineda would not be eligible to be kept next year as a Rookie Keeper. However, since it is a unique situation, I'm open to rule changes as long as you can get 5 other owners to vote with you.
It's cool. F that guy anyway.
Hal·la·day, n. 1. every fifth day in Philadelphia. 2. a day of rest for the bullpen. 3. innings eater. 4. doc. 5. ace.
I figure I'll get Harper into my lineup while he's looking good to start the year.
Also, I know most of you all would have put me in the bottom 3, hell I probably would have put me down there since I really don't have much of an anchor on my team, but this hot start is definitely nice to be riding here. It may just give me that shot to not finish in the bottom 3 this year which would be a solid accomplishment in my book. I'd like to thank Reimold and Freese for the offense and some solid starts from Capuano and Peavy for looking like it's 2005 again.
Yeah, I can understand Red adding/dropping his starters to he can rack up 100 innings per week and essentially have 3-5 extra roster spots but adding/dropping Middlebrooks when you have Coco Crisp sucking it up?
Can't wait for Hultzen/Miller/Odorizzi to be called up this summer
Grounded Polo wrote::-b Yeah, I can understand Red adding/dropping his starters to he can rack up 100 innings per week and essentially have 3-5 extra roster spots but adding/dropping Middlebrooks when you have Coco Crisp sucking it up?
Can't wait for Hultzen/Miller/Odorizzi to be called up this summer.
Can't say it's worked out all that well. Great, so I seem to win K's and W's most weeks but forget ERA and Whip. Little scary now that my hitting has cooled.
With the new rule, once a player surpasses AB's or IP and loses his rookie status, shouldn't we remove them from our MiLB roster (if they currently sit on our active roster on yahoo)?
Seems this should be the case since the player is now considered like any other non-rookie on our rosters, no?
With the new rule, once a player surpasses AB's or IP and loses his rookie status, shouldn't we remove them from our MiLB roster (if they currently sit on our active roster on yahoo)?
Seems this should be the case since the player is now considered like any other non-rookie on our rosters, no?
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by 
