I'd go with Bruce and Gallardo in a dynasty. Bruce can be a hitter with value not too far below Ramirez and Gallardo was spectacular in 2007. Basically, there's a safe chance that combined, they will have pretty equal value to Manny but since they're also young, there's also a pretty good chance they could surpass Manny.
Grounded Polo wrote:I'd go with Bruce and Gallardo in a dynasty. Bruce can be a hitter with value not too far below Ramirez and Gallardo was spectacular in 2007. Basically, there's a safe chance that combined, they will have pretty equal value to Manny but since they're also young, there's also a pretty good chance they could surpass Manny.
I'd prefer the Gallardo/Bruce side. If someone was to base the trade off of 2008 stats, then Manny is the better side. But, for all the reasons stated in the above post, the Gallardo/Bruce side is better.
Grounded Polo wrote:I'd go with Bruce and Gallardo in a dynasty. Bruce can be a hitter with value not too far below Ramirez and Gallardo was spectacular in 2007. Basically, there's a safe chance that combined, they will have pretty equal value to Manny but since they're also young, there's also a pretty good chance they could surpass Manny.
Grounded Polo wrote:I'd go with Bruce and Gallardo in a dynasty. Bruce can be a hitter with value not too far below Ramirez and Gallardo was spectacular in 2007. Basically, there's a safe chance that combined, they will have pretty equal value to Manny but since they're also young, there's also a pretty good chance they could surpass Manny.
I agree with the crazy Mets fan.
But good trade. Nothing wrong with either side.
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."- Douglas Adams