noseeum wrote:As a Yankee fan, I have to say that signing Bradley and taking Peavy on as a Padres salary dump would just not be fair to the rest of the league.
The Cubs should choose one or the other, for the good of baseball.
I wouldn't mind.
Rocinante2: you know Rocinante2: its easy to dismiss the orioles as a bad team ofanrex: go on Rocinante2: i'm done Rocinante2: lmao
noseeum wrote:As a Yankee fan, I have to say that signing Bradley and taking Peavy on as a Padres salary dump would just not be fair to the rest of the league.
The Cubs should choose one or the other, for the good of baseball.
Seriously, where do the Cubs get off on stealing premiere players that small-market teams cannot afford? The Cubs are what is wrong with baseball. Unbelievable.
noseeum wrote:As a Yankee fan, I have to say that signing Bradley and taking Peavy on as a Padres salary dump would just not be fair to the rest of the league.
The Cubs should choose one or the other, for the good of baseball.
Seriously, where do the Cubs get off on stealing premiere players that small-market teams cannot afford? The Cubs are what is wrong with baseball. Unbelievable.
Rocinante2: you know Rocinante2: its easy to dismiss the orioles as a bad team ofanrex: go on Rocinante2: i'm done Rocinante2: lmao
I could point out the difference between making multiple wily trades to get a player like Peavy, and throwing massive sums of money at a player like Sabathia.....but what's the point?
Sometimes it takes a crazy person to see the truth. If so, I'm a freaking lunatic.
ThatDude wrote:I'd prefer they didn't sign Bradley and grabbed Dunn instead....
Not sure why you'd want that. He may be a slightly better hitter, but he's a much worse fielder.
Considering the fact that Dunn can play more than 100 games in a season, I'd say he's a far better hitter. Since he'll actually, ya know, be on the active roster and able to hit.
Sometimes it takes a crazy person to see the truth. If so, I'm a freaking lunatic.
ThatDude wrote:I'd prefer they didn't sign Bradley and grabbed Dunn instead....
Not sure why you'd want that. He may be a slightly better hitter, but he's a much worse fielder.
Considering the fact that Dunn can play more than 100 games in a season, I'd say he's a far better hitter. Since he'll actually, ya know, be on the active roster and able to hit.
Bradley is a plus hitter and a plus fielder. Even if you play him 100 games and then some scrub in the other 60 games you'll get more production out of that duo then you would Dunn.
ThatDude wrote:I'd prefer they didn't sign Bradley and grabbed Dunn instead....
Not sure why you'd want that. He may be a slightly better hitter, but he's a much worse fielder.
Considering the fact that Dunn can play more than 100 games in a season, I'd say he's a far better hitter. Since he'll actually, ya know, be on the active roster and able to hit.
Bradley has never made even one error during his times on the disabled list. He hasn't struck out either. There's something to be said for that. What it is, I have no idea!
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by Neato Torpedo » Wed Dec 31, 2008 3:03 pm 
He may be a slightly better hitter, but he's a much worse fielder.
