SpecialFNK wrote:how do you define who was the best player? it depends what stats your looking at.
All of the stats should come into play, and then the best player in the entire league should win the award. It's not the "who was the most valuable to their team" award (and as Hootie explained, Howard wasn't even the most valuable on his team, let alone the entire league), it's the "most valuable player in the league" award.
And the wins stuff is funny.
I bet Minnesota and Chicago would kill for an extra win from April right about now, instead of having to have a playoff game tomorrow.
It could be argued that locking up the division fast is more valuable than squeeking out a playoff spot right at the very end. So "when" teams get wins, is really irrelevant to anything.
Yes doctor, I am sick.
Sick of those who are spineless.
Sick of those who feel self-entitled.
Sick of those who are hypocrites.
Yes doctor, an army is forming.
Yes doctor, there will be a war.
Yes doctor, there will be blood.....