DVauthrin wrote: jmudukes2008 wrote: T-fence92 wrote:
He isn't getting any value in return for Hanley.
VETO IT NOW!!!!!
No value in return for Hanley?!?! Really?! Are people this incomptetent or did you just type your reply wrong. The guy giving away Hanley is getting a WAYYYYYY better deal. If you can't see that then you do not belong in the cafe. Please leave. Now.
every fantasy player on the planet would take the team getting hanley and it's not close. If you think the person getting young and reynolds wins this deal, you are the one who shouldn't be helping others judge their trades.
Explain to me how this "[is] not close." As the poster after me said, Young is on pace for over 100 runs, and would have started the all-star game if the fans of that other team in my home state didn't pour in votes for Jeter. Although he's hitting only .250, Reynolds has a substantial amount of pop in his bat, and will end the year with over 30 homeruns. The original poster didn't state that this was a keeper league...if it is then I agree that this trade is ridiculous...but if it's not, which I assume it's not because he would have mentioned it, then this trade makes quite a bit of sense to me. Of course you'd have to know if the other team needs a third basemen...which if that's the case, then I would make this trade. For me to say, "leave the cafe" was a little rough, albeit for someone to write "VETO THE TRADE" without much substance backing that declaration then I think it deservadely had a right to be addressed. Even though I was joking, I apologize for writing that, but don't call me a "retard" unless you've found serious flaws in my logic...as I've yet to see yours.