wrveres wrote:todays scientist's can't explain the Pyramids. They only have theory's.
Neato wrote:I scored a 33 on the reading portion of the ACT ... Also, scientists do have many possible models describing how the pyramids were built.
prosecution rests!edit:
That's a historian's problem, dude. We know that one of those models is right, but records kept on hardened mud tend to disintegrate.Verdict: not guilty, but a mistrial is declared due to prosecution's incompetence. Bring back Yoda!
you don't get to decide your own verdict you fool. what world do you live in? it's why you have peers.
So in closing. i charge neato lacks reading comprehension. he clearly repeated what i said, just not as witty. he clearly thought i said scientists 2500 years ago were smarter than today, when i said nothing like that. i even went out of my way to highlight the very words that said so ... Neato's only defense was he did well on a test that has been dummied down to get as many passing scores as possible. Not to mention, mummy and daddy probably paid for one or two "practice" reading comprehension tests prior to the official one. As my peers, you have no choice but to find the defendant .. guilty.
wrveres wrote:it saddens me when todays college students lack reading comprehension. But hey, using your logic ... todays scientist's can't explain the Pyramids. They only have theory's. Apparently those Egyptians were much smarter than us.
I'm pretty sure that today's scientists could figure out a much more effective way of building pyramids than the Egyptians used.
more efficient, sure. im not saying, nor have i said anywhere that they had more knowledge, as in volumes of, than we do today. its just that they did things that we can't explain, even today. and besides, i was clearly using neato logic there.
I think it is very clear that we are way smarter. We can build way better pyramids, we reverse engineered their dance moves and turned it into an 80s pop song, and most of us had the common sense to move out of the desert.
That's a historian's problem, dude. We know that one of those models is right, but records kept on hardened mud tend to disintegrate.Verdict: not guilty, but a mistrial is declared due to prosecution's incompetence. Bring back Yoda!
you don't get to decide your own verdict you fool. what world do you live in? it's why you have peers.
So in closing. i charge neato lacks reading comprehension. he clearly repeated what i said, just not as witty. he clearly thought i said scientists 2500 years ago were smarter than today, when i said nothing like that. i even went out of my way to highlight the very words that said so ... Neato's only defense was he did well on a test that has been dummied down to get as many passing scores as possible. Not to mention, mummy and daddy probably paid for one or two "practice" reading comprehension tests prior to the official one. As my peers, you have no choice but to find the defendant .. guilty.
kthnks
Rocinante2: you know Rocinante2: its easy to dismiss the orioles as a bad team ofanrex: go on Rocinante2: i'm done Rocinante2: lmao
Tavish wrote:I'm pretty sure that today's scientists could figure out a much more effective way of building pyramids than the Egyptians used.
more efficient, sure. im not saying, nor have i said anywhere that they had more knowledge, as in volumes of, than we do today. its just that they did things that we can't explain, even today. and besides, i was clearly using neato logic there.
I think it is very clear that we are way smarter. We can build way better pyramids, we reverse engineered their dance moves and turned it into an 80s pop song, and most of us had the common sense to move out of the desert.
it wasn't a desert when they were there. Not like it is now. I blame Al Gore.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by wrveres » Tue May 10, 2011 7:34 pm 
Bring back Yoda!
![:-]](./images/smilies/smirk.gif "Scottie")
