cakes wrote:All of your posts started with the same thing: "your argument is weak".
If you're not going to bother to read ALL
the posts you're responding to, why bother posting?
cakes wrote:Sometimes its the only way to get jerks to shut up
You think I care about you're childish insults about sexuality? You have a meager 9 total posts and I didn't count them but it looks like all of them might be in this topic? You obviously haven't read anything on this board I've posted other then what's in this topic or you wouldn't be making such uninformed statements. You're just a newbie trolling and trying to play BMOC. I bet you created an account just so you could post to this topic and stir the pot.
cakes wrote:I think my choice of argument style served its purpose.
Argument style? You call childish insults with no real substance at all to back it up an argument style? I guess because it works on playgrounds?
cakes wrote:If you're losing the debate, just call your opponent stupid.
That's basically what all your posts directed at me have said in one way or another. What does that say about you when all your responses imply I'm stupid and say nothing else? Hopefully I've made it clear your childish, totally lacking of substance, posts don't bother me and as such I won't be replying to any more of them. I'm only responding to you this one time because I just didn't want you thinking your posts had any influence whatsoever. They don't.
Carew7 wrote:if you had been paying attention last night you woulda known Roy Oswalt was pitching
That's a big assumption to make. Why would everyone who had no players involved in that game care or bother to look and therefore know Oswalt was pitching? Some people might, but everyone? Do you honestly believe that?
Carew7 wrote:but ya it is relavant in this forum because it is a player update..........causing this thread to go off topic
Even if but some absurd technicality it had any relevance whatsoever, you still failed to clearly identify who you were talking about. If you're going to insist it belongs in this forum and not the Cheering and Venting forum, which is exactly what you were doing then there's really no hope for you. You created the off topic thread so you have only yourself to blame. If you'd posted OSWALT!!!! then it would have been clear who you were talking about, but no less off topic. That you can't admit ROY could be interpreted to mean Rookie of the year or even as other people mentioned another Roy is baffling. Especially when there are multiple rookie pitchers who were mentioned preseason as possible ROY candidates but have struggled this year.