For everyone squabbling over this thread, pause for a moment and consider what you're really arguing about. Whether or not the title of a random post on a fantasy baseball forum is vague, and whether said post belongs in this forum or in a different forum.
Dear God people, who really cares at this point? Lets lighten the mood a bit, this is fantasy baseball, not the Cuban Missile Crisis. Save your argumentative powers for something that really matters.
"This guy leads the league in most offensive categories, including nose hair..."
ROC AllStars wrote:For everyone squabbling over this thread, pause for a moment and consider what you're really arguing about. Whether or not the title of a random post on a fantasy baseball forum is vague, and whether said post belongs in this forum or in a different forum.
Dear God people, who really cares at this point? Lets lighten the mood a bit, this is fantasy baseball, not the Cuban Missile Crisis. Save your argumentative powers for something that really matters.
Is there like a quota for making people feel bad\stupid about FB?
To those who made such a big deal about this topic: You're gay!! See the exclamation? I'm excited!
ROY OSWALT was the first player that came to my mind and he's not even on my roster. I knew about his last start and how well it went. But, hey, I'm a logical person.
And, dude, wildbill...you're a jerk. All of your posts started with the same thing: "your argument is weak". Again, that's gay...read your own arguments once in a while...you'll see what weak really is.
You're not as smart as you think you are. I bet you're a Barry Soetoro fan.
cakes wrote:To those who made such a big deal about this topic: You're gay!! See the exclamation? I'm excited!
ROY OSWALT was the first player that came to my mind and he's not even on my roster. I knew about his last start and how well it went. But, hey, I'm a logical person.
And, dude, wildbill...you're a jerk. All of your posts started with the same thing: "your argument is weak". Again, that's gay...read your own arguments once in a while...you'll see what weak really is.
You're not as smart as you think you are. I bet you're a Barry Soetoro fan.
Wow. Bringing sexual orientation AND politics into the conversation. That's sure to lighten the mood. While we're at it, what's everyone's feeling on the infallibility of the Pope?
"This guy leads the league in most offensive categories, including nose hair..."
Sometimes its the only way to get jerks to shut up. You can't let people just walk around like their crap don't stink while they rub that same crap in your face.
There are different meanings for fat (see phat) and so that's my reasoning for accepting a 2nd meaning for "gay". It has nothing to do with his sexual orientation. We both know what it means.
cakes wrote:Sometimes its the only way to get jerks to shut up. You can't let people just walk around like their crap don't stink while they rub that same crap in your face.
There are different meanings for fat (see phat) and so that's my reasoning for accepting a 2nd meaning for "gay". It has nothing to do with his sexual orientation. We both know what it means.
I agree on the second meaning. But if you're trying to critique someone's argument, you're better off using language that makes you sound like YOU can make a credible argument. That's all.
"This guy leads the league in most offensive categories, including nose hair..."
Wow. Bringing sexual orientation AND politics into the conversation. That's sure to lighten the mood. While we're at it, what's everyone's feeling on the infallibility of the Pope?[/quote]
I thought Popes were supposed to be abstinate.............
.....ain't nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day. ...