Closers - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Closers

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Closers

Postby MikeeDee » Thu Feb 26, 2004 4:01 pm

Nice article from Baseball Prospectus on closers:

Closers are an aberration in baseball's history, a massive misallocation of resources, and eventually will go the way of the dinosaurs Carl Everett doesn't believe in.

A pure closer is a reliever who only comes in to protect a one- to three-run lead, only in the ninth. The worst pitcher in baseball stands a great chance of pitching the ninth inning without giving up three runs. With no outs, a team with an average offense against an average pitcher can expect to score half a run. The best offense in baseball last year, the Red Sox, averaged about .65 runs/half inning over the course of the season. The worst reliever in the major leagues last year was Jaret Wright, who gave up 46 runs in just over 56 innings of work--.82 runs an inning. Given a three-run lead in the ninth, pitching against the Red Sox, Wright could reasonably be expected to give up an average of a run each appearance, and if he did it all season, he'd rack up 20 saves, be anointed a proven closer, and sign with the Mets for $4 million a year.

This makes no sense. Keith Woolner did a really cool study on how many runs get scored in an inning, and between 1980 and 1998, 94.6% of all innings had less than three runs scored; 87.8% had less than two, and 73% of all innings played saw no runs scored.

It's obvious then that having a team's best pitcher in with a three-run lead doesn't make much sense, because almost anyone could do that job. Why do teams insist on doing this?

Blame the save. It's a counting statistic that was intended to measure an event--whether that's an event worth counting we can debate another time. But the measurement of that event led to the development of a role: the closer, who pitches only when his team has a lead of one to three runs, and in so doing becomes eligible to pick up a save. This role, once established, then picked up baggage of its own: the guy has to throw really fast, be mean, a real gun-slinger with attitude...even though Jeff Montgomery was a fine closer with none of those qualities.

A pure closer on an average team will probably only see 40, 50 chances to come into a game and pitch the ninth. Woolner's study also found that a perfect closer--one who never gives up a run pitching the ninth every time his team is ahead--only gives his team four more games in the standings. By contrast, a good but not quite elite offensive player or starting pitcher is worth four or five games; Barry Bonds was worth 11.5 wins last season. Eric Gagne, who was about as perfect as a closer can be in 2002, was worth only three games last year over what you'd predict for the Dodgers if they'd replaced him with innings from normal pitchers--and Gagne actually pitched more than one inning more than 10 times last year.

Where should a team's best reliever come in, then, if not to protect ninth-inning leads? Our Rany Jazayerli has examined this issue, and concluded that in a neutral ballpark with essentially equal teams, below are the situations where a reliever makes the most impact on a team's win percentage. The impact is in parentheses, so if the team could be expected to win .600 of their games when up by one but .700 if they use their closer, then you'd see (.100).


Home Away
1) Top 9th, lead by 1 (.170) 1) Bottom 9th, lead by 1 (.223)
2) Top 9th, tied (.160) 2) Bottom 8th, lead by 1 (.158)
3) Top 8th, lead by 1 (.123) 3) Bottom 9th, tied (.155)
4) Top 8th, tied (.115) 4) Bottom 8th, tied (.122)
5) Top 7th, lead by 1 (.096) 5) Bottom 9th, lead by 2 (.113)
6) Top 7th, tied (.092) 6) Bottom 7th, lead by 1 (.111)
7) Top 9th, lead by 2 (.080) 7) Bottom 8th, lead by 2 (.108)

This reaches back to Ye Good Old Days, when teams didn't have closers, they had 'stoppers', the firemen who came in not just when the game was close, but when the starter was faltering. These brave souls would come in not with a lead and no one on, but with the game tied and two runners on--situations where being dominant and getting the outs has a clear and significant impact on the game's final score. These were situations where Gagne might strike out three guys to get out of the jam unscathed, while Jaret Wright's predictable single scores two runs and costs the ballgame. The tighter the situation, the more important it is to have your best pitcher on the mound. We understand this instinctually--you want your best hitter at the most important point in the game--but for some reason the modern mystique around the ninth inning has clouded the judgement of managers across the league.

This is why modern bullpen usage is inefficient. It's like saving your best pinch-hitter for when you're behind by three runs, or only starting your best option at shortstop on days when there's a full moon because that's when things get crazy. Resources should always be deployed where they can do the most good, and modern closers as blood-lusting Gods of War, along with their Phobos/Deimos setup men (one lefty, one righty), are a bad use of resources.
MikeeDee
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar
Mock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 1619
Joined: 3 Dec 2002
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby DJUmperPSU » Thu Feb 26, 2004 4:03 pm

I guess I never really thought about it that way, pretty cool.... but boston still blows.
DJUmperPSU
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 457
(Past Year: 3)
Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Miami

Postby bleach168 » Thu Feb 26, 2004 4:56 pm

While I agree for the most part with the article, he does leave out a very important fact that in the 9th inning, opposing managers usually throw the kitchen sink at the closers including pinch hitting, pinch running, bunting, or whatever it takes to tie the game. In the 8th inning, rarely does this stuff happen.

I do agree that using your closer to protect a 3 run league is inefficient.
"And so he spoke, and so he spoke, that lord of Castamere. But now the rains weep o'er his hall, with no one there to hear." - The Rains of Castamere
bleach168
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy Expert
Posts: 5058
(Past Year: 16)
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Mookie4ever » Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:13 pm

I agree with Belch. The hitting team will not be pinch hitting for their light hitting ss and defensive specialist c in the first inning even if they are behind by 2 runs and have men in scoring position (they certainly will not be pinch hitting for their pitcher in the first inning). Both teams are maximizing their ability to win in the ninth because it could very well be the last inning of the game - you can't say that for the first inning.

If you have one guaranteed scorless inning per game in your back pocket (or the closest thing to it - Gagne for one inning) you want to save it for when it will guarantee you a win - the ninth.

I remember back when Tom Henke would only be brought out in save situations. I thought that it was crazy but the Jays had the good fortune to also have Duane Ward to put out fires that came up before the 9th.

I really hope that this does not evolve into another discussion about "clutch" again.
Image
Mookie4ever
Head Moderator
Head Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe SpotterHockey ModBasketball ModFootball ModMatchup Meltdown ChampionPick 3 Weekly WinnerSweet 16 SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 19545
(Past Year: 275)
Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Hakuna, Montana

Postby MikeeDee » Thu Feb 26, 2004 5:35 pm

Mookie4ever wrote:I really hope that this does not evolve into another discussion about "clutch" again.


LOL
MikeeDee
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar
Mock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 1619
Joined: 3 Dec 2002
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby HOOTIE » Fri Feb 27, 2004 12:06 am

I have always said closer is the most overrated position. And saves and blown saves are bad stats. Bad closers can save 30-40. Good closers are around 80-85%. Bad closers are around 70-75%.
Smells Like Teen Spirit
HOOTIE
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe Ranker
Posts: 15115
(Past Year: 297)
Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Pearl Jam country, right next door to Nirvana, Soundgarden, and Alice in Chains.

Postby colour wolf » Fri Feb 27, 2004 5:17 am

Mookie4ever wrote:I agree with Belch.


I don't really have anything to add, but this is one of the funniest typos I've read for awhile! :-D
colour wolf
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 259
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Tokyo

Postby prodpaul » Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:27 am

Thanks for the article. Nice read.
Image

Tetelestai
prodpaul
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
CafeholicCafe WriterSweet 16 Survivor
Posts: 2475
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Kansas City, MO


Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Y`s Guy and 7 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact