should i veto the trade? Arod and Howard involved

[philly4life553]

Alright here is the deal.
Team A gets
A-Rod and Delgado
Team B gets
Howard, Beltre, and Jared Weaver.
I don't think the trade is even because team a is not giving up enough. but is it bad enough to veto. team a also finished second last year and won the year before. while team b is in his first year. what should i do?

[machine3]

No veto. I would definitely take the A-Rod side, but it's not ridiculous enough for a veto.

[Matthias]

Let it go. It's fine.

[abrage22]

this trade is pretty even what are you talking about

[Bloody Sox]

That is DEFINITELY close enough not to veto. In fact, its pretty darn even. Why do you think Team A is not giving up enough? They are giving up Howard who is a first rounder, Beltre who is pretty much a wash with Delgado, and Weaver who is much better than a FA pitcher. Let's say that pitcher was someone like Marcum. The value difference between A-Rod and Howard is about the same as Weaver and Marcum, IMO. A trade has to be obviously lopsided to veto.

[philly4life553]

thanks everyone for your help. i don't like to veto trades unless they are awful. i didn't think this trade was that bad. i just wanted to get another opinion on it, so when i do pass it through. the leauge wouldn't go crazy.