Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **ramble2** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 2:56 pm

He signed a 5 year deal to play his home games at TBA:

from ESPN:

The Rangers also finalized a $15.25 million, five-year contract with All-Star third baseman Hank Blalock. The deal includes a club option for a sixth year.

Okay, okay, it's not like he was going to be a FA anytime soon. Still, this means no arbitration, no contract distractions, and this also makes him unlikely to be traded. If he continues to produce and - dare I say it - improve, $3 million dollars a year is a damn good bargain.

by **hwilensk261** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:06 pm

Wow- Talk about a good deal for the Rangers. $3 mil a yr for 5 yrs with his potential. They could have a huge bargain in their hands for years to come. Good job Rangers management!

by **hwilensk261** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:07 pm

Wow- Talk about a good deal for the Rangers. $3 mil a yr for 5 yrs with his potential. They could have a huge bargain in their hands for years to come. Good job Rangers management!

by **bell** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 3:27 pm

Wow- Talk about a good deal for the Rangers. $3 mil a yr for 5 yrs with his potential. They could have a huge bargain in their hands for years to come. Good job Rangers management!

by **Lofunzo** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 4:15 pm

Is there an echo?? :-D

by **Jivedude** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 5:15 pm

Is there an echo echo echo echo?

by **DieHardCubbie** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 6:24 pm

Solid move by the Rangers....just hope there is no loop holes in that contract....that will let him get away early.... :-)

by **wrveres** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:38 pm

"...as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns--the ones we don't know we don't know."

by **kentx12** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:38 pm

wrveres wrote:"...as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns--the ones we don't know we don't know."

wrveres, what the hell are you talking about. Happy hour must have came early tonight.

by **grammysboy** » Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:55 pm

wrveres wrote:"...as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns--the ones we don't know we don't know."

Who would've known?

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Good news for Blalock fans/owners ...

Good news for Blalock fans/owners ...

Who is online