when do you guys take 2b

[NZ Eff]

for starters, you were both wrong, so you're arguing about who was less wrong

No argument, I'm right and numb nuts is wrong

[Snakes Gould]

well the limited games and abs was part of the equation, so to simply say in X amount of games he was productive is just false.

[NZ Eff]

well the limited games and abs was part of the equation, so to simply say in X amount of games he was productive is just false.

Overall this year Castillo has still had some value, limited as it may have been. It certainly has been greater than Kent's.

As far as saying in X amount of games he was productive is being false, well for me he has been productive. I'm not cherry picking games, those are his numbers on my roster. He was very valuable to me as my MI before he hit the DL. I've had difficulty covering the position since. Extrapolated over a season he was giving me 100 runs, 10 HR's, 70 RBI's and 40 SB's with a .265 BA.
Even if Kent had have been available I would not have touched him with a 10 foot barge pole. He's garbage. 40 runs scored in 430 ab's is absolutely pathetic for a guy that has hit in the 3 and 4 hole all season on a team that is going to win the NL West.

[Yoda]

lol NZ is Eff'd

[NZ Eff]

Ahh, now I see why you have that jester icon.

[Yoda]

Where is your sense of humor?

The entire debate about whether Kent or Castillo is better is very silly anyway. Lighten up dude.

[NZ Eff]

Where is your sense of humor?

The entire debate about whether Kent or Castillo is better is very silly anyway. Lighten up dude.

[KronJon]

Yearly production - Kent was better.

Average production - Castillo was better.

[Yoda]

Where is your sense of humor?

The entire debate about whether Kent or Castillo is better is very silly anyway. Lighten up dude.

mmmk...

[NZ Eff]

Yearly production - Kent was better.

Average production - Castillo was better.

the year isn't finished yet