statsman88 wrote:Very cool guys, I'll be poppin my head in and voting, this looks like fun
One little thing, I was wondering why Batman gets in as a TV Character, it would seem that he belongs in Superhero Battle's, not TV characters. We don't have Superman or Spiderman so I was kinda wondering how he got in.
And Kevin or Stanley from the office would be my vote to replace him
It's the old Batman character from the Boom! Bop! Thoom! shows...
Mint!
AussieDodger
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 11291
(Past Year: 417)
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 467
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: What do you mean, Flash Gordon approaching?
Art Vandelay wrote:That 8 vs 9 matchup in the bracket on the top left there is going to be a tough one: My hatred for Friends vs my disdain for Sci Fi. I'll have to think long and hard on that one.
X-Files was actually a great show back in the 90s. Friends...well let's say I share your hatred. Mulder owns Chandler Bing, you've gotta pick him.
Although now that I've said that, you'll probably just pick Chandler.
Art Vandelay wrote:That 8 vs 9 matchup in the bracket on the top left there is going to be a tough one: My hatred for Friends vs my disdain for Sci Fi. I'll have to think long and hard on that one.
X-Files was actually a great show back in the 90s. Friends...well let's say I share your hatred. Mulder owns Chandler Bing, you've gotta pick him.
Although now that I've said that, you'll probably just pick Chandler.
Is there an option to eliminate both?
AussieDodger
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 11291
(Past Year: 417)
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 467
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: What do you mean, Flash Gordon approaching?
Art Vandelay wrote:That 8 vs 9 matchup in the bracket on the top left there is going to be a tough one: My hatred for Friends vs my disdain for Sci Fi. I'll have to think long and hard on that one.
X-Files was actually a great show back in the 90s. Friends...well let's say I share your hatred. Mulder owns Chandler Bing, you've gotta pick him.
Although now that I've said that, you'll probably just pick Chandler.
homer is a number 2 seed, not 15. while i probably would have agreed that google hits would have been the best seeding strategy, there are many flaws in the bracketing, but still cool none the less
george costanza as a 10 seed is ridiculous. definitely final four worthy.
Snakes Gould wrote:homer is a number 2 seed, not 15. while i probably would have agreed that google hits would have been the best seeding strategy, there are many flaws in the bracketing, but still cool none the less
george costanza as a 10 seed is ridiculous. definitely final four worthy.
I accidentally switched Homer and Elaine's seedings. I agree there are flaws in the bracketing. I'll let somebody else handle the other battles this off season.
cordscords wrote:Thanks for stepping up Old Style. I wouldnt have this thing up and running until 2morrow night, and my brackets would probably look even worse.
Good job.
No doubt, very nice.
The seedings don't really matter to me, because it would have been just as easy to pick names from a hat. Whoever wins is gonna win no matter who they face along the way...
cordscords wrote:Thanks for stepping up Old Style. I wouldnt have this thing up and running until 2morrow night, and my brackets would probably look even worse.
Good job.
No doubt, very nice.
The seedings don't really matter to me, because it would have been just as easy to pick names from a hat. Whoever wins is gonna win no matter who they face along the way...
good point. but there are some guys who should be going a little further than others, but fall into a tough 1st round matchup.