davidmarver wrote:ACS, how about, after adjusting for pitchers faced, you adjust for the stadium as well? This season, for every one hit in a nuetral stadium, a hitter in Coors Field gets 1.122 hits due to park factors, while a hitter in Turner Field gets 0.905 hits.
So in other words, Holliday has 12.6 extra hits this season because of Coors Field. His nuetral home batting average -- if Coors Field was nuetral -- would be .334 instead of .374. This would make his total batting average .319.
Chipper, on the other hand, has 7.98 less hits this season because of Turner Field. His nuetral home batting average would be .356 instead of .322. This would make his total batting average .359.
You still haven't adjusted for pitchers faced. And you really can't...All I'm trying to say is that basically everyone is even here.
If you are gonna discount for Coors discount for chipper getting to face the nationals and marlins a ton each year.
150 ab's by the way is a quarter of the season which is a lot
davidmarver wrote:ACS, how about, after adjusting for pitchers faced, you adjust for the stadium as well? This season, for every one hit in a nuetral stadium, a hitter in Coors Field gets 1.122 hits due to park factors, while a hitter in Turner Field gets 0.905 hits.
So in other words, Holliday has 12.6 extra hits this season because of Coors Field. His nuetral home batting average -- if Coors Field was nuetral -- would be .334 instead of .374. This would make his total batting average .319.
Chipper, on the other hand, has 7.98 less hits this season because of Turner Field. His nuetral home batting average would be .356 instead of .322. This would make his total batting average .359.
You still haven't adjusted for pitchers faced. And you really can't...All I'm trying to say is that basically everyone is even here.
If you are gonna discount for Coors discount for chipper getting to face the nationals and marlins a ton each year.
150 ab's by the way is a quarter of the season which is a lot
True, but Holliday's pitcher's faced average against is .250. Chipper's, at the very highest, wouldn't be above .255, meaning a pretty small difference compared to the park effects.
Just for fun Acs, I saw your new sig and thought it would be worth looking into. Here are the pitchers you listed and the rest of the pitchers in the top 10 in ERA along with the PAs against those pitchers. Holliday/Rollins/Wright
Tavish wrote:Just for fun Acs, I saw your new sig and thought it would be worth looking into. Here are the pitchers you listed and the rest of the pitchers in the top 10 in ERA along with the PAs against those pitchers. Holliday/Rollins/Wright
Tavish wrote:Just for fun Acs, I saw your new sig and thought it would be worth looking into. Here are the pitchers you listed and the rest of the pitchers in the top 10 in ERA along with the PAs against those pitchers. Holliday/Rollins/Wright
I dont get it...... if those guys had more at bats, wouldnt that mean just more chances for them to get hits and raise there average? You should be happy that they dont have more at bats than there averages would probably be higher. You cant always assume that they are going to slump becuase they may hit a hot streak