Trojan Pony wrote:Does it change anything, in your eyes, if it's a keeper league and the trade involves a stud keeper and a non-keeper-eligible player? For example, let's say the trade is Alex Rios for Jake Peavy and Peavy gets injured the day after the trade is accepted and he's out for the rest of the season. Then you would have one team getting Alex Rios for 3 years and another team SOL. Still gotta pass it?
Yes - its all a matter of timing. When the deal is agreed upon, it is locked in. The evaluation period should not consider what happens after the deal is agreed upon - it is meant to evaluate the deal as the managers agreed upon. How is it any different than Peavy getting hurt the day after the veto period? Should you be able to retroactively veto? Of course not.
"The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else"