Should this one get the veto - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Should this one get the veto

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Should this one get the veto

Postby jake_harv88 » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:27 pm

Team A trades: Bedard/Andruw Jones
Team B trades: Vlad/Atkins/Hughes


What do you guys think? Is that one worthy of the almighty veto? Thanks for the help guys, Im really torn on this issue...
jake_harv88
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar
Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterWeb Supporter
Posts: 2021
(Past Year: 25)
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The Cafe of Fantasies

Re: Should this one get the veto

Postby CBMGreatOne » Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:38 pm

On the merits of its value alone, it is not vetoable. You could argue that Bedard is the most valuable entity in this trade (even though I probably wouldn't). In any case Bedard and Andruw are valuable enough to command that kind of return. Hughes is a highly speculative acquisition anyhow.

If player value is the only element of this trade that you find objectionable, I'd say it's not vetoable.
CBMGreatOne
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 3166
(Past Year: 89)
Joined: 30 May 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Should this one get the veto

Postby DevilDriver » Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:33 pm

Not vetoable. I can't tell which side is getting the better end.
Image
DevilDriver
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafeholic
Posts: 3431
Joined: 4 Dec 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Beast mode

Re: Should this one get the veto

Postby Bloody Sox » Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:53 pm

I'd much prefer the Vlad side, but I can see an argument the other way. NO VETO.
"The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else"
Bloody Sox
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2148
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Fenway Park, RF Roof Deck

Re: Should this one get the veto

Postby Oatsdad » Fri Aug 03, 2007 6:02 pm

Not even remotely vetoable - it's dopey to even ask in a case like this... :-t
Oatsdad
Major League Manager
Major League Manager


Posts: 1295
Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Should this one get the veto

Postby BigMak » Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:09 pm

Nothing at all wrong with that deal
BigMak
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor


Posts: 91
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball


Return to Commissioner's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Tuesday, Jul. 22
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Texas at NY Yankees
(7:05 pm)
San Francisco at Philadelphia
(7:05 pm)
LA Dodgers at Pittsburgh
(7:05 pm)
Boston at Toronto
(7:07 pm)
Miami at Atlanta
(7:10 pm)
San Diego at Chi Cubs
(8:05 pm)
Cleveland at Minnesota
(8:10 pm)
Cincinnati at Milwaukee
(8:10 pm)
Kansas City at Chi White Sox
(8:10 pm)
Tampa Bay at St. Louis
(8:15 pm)
Washington at Colorado
(8:40 pm)
Detroit at Arizona
(9:40 pm)
Baltimore at LA Angels
(10:05 pm)
Houston at Oakland
(10:05 pm)
NY Mets at Seattle
(10:10 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact