Should this one get the veto

[jake_harv88]

Team A trades: Bedard/Andruw Jones
Team B trades: Vlad/Atkins/Hughes


What do you guys think? Is that one worthy of the almighty veto? Thanks for the help guys, Im really torn on this issue...

[CBMGreatOne]

On the merits of its value alone, it is not vetoable. You could argue that Bedard is the most valuable entity in this trade (even though I probably wouldn't). In any case Bedard and Andruw are valuable enough to command that kind of return. Hughes is a highly speculative acquisition anyhow.

If player value is the only element of this trade that you find objectionable, I'd say it's not vetoable.

[DevilDriver]

Not vetoable. I can't tell which side is getting the better end.

[Bloody Sox]

I'd much prefer the Vlad side, but I can see an argument the other way. NO VETO.

[Oatsdad]

Not even remotely vetoable - it's dopey to even ask in a case like this...

[BigMak]

Nothing at all wrong with that deal