If you feel that Reyes will top out at 10 homeruns most years and Hanley will hit 30 while stealing 50, then yes, Hanley is the clear choice. I just don't feel that way. I honestly see Reyes as a 15-20 HR guy most years, with Hanley between 25-30. But I see Reyes as lead off guy for most of his career, while I see Hanley as a 3 hitter. More RBI's, yes, but much less SB's. Based solely on my projections, Reyes would be the slightly more valuable commodity.