theclefe wrote:I was hoping this thread was advice supported by science, telling us to talk to a girl before she gets drunk so you'll be on her mind later. I don't know if that would work though. That's why I need the science...
For that I'd just go with roofies
While Cu may lack class, he certainly excels in determination.
Coppermine wrote:Just to clarify, originally I saw no picture. Nothing, nada. That's because I have the essential Firefox extension AdBlock Plus (filtered to allow FBC banners through, of course ). Ironically, turning off AdBlock shows, agast, an advertisement from, none other, than the good old "ad council," one of my favorite, misinformed public service announcement non-profit organizations.
Before I say anything, I'd just like to point out that the Ad Council is responsible for the ads, up to and including the 21st century, that depict "stoners" (aka, weed smokers) as violent and irrational. Whether or not they're irrational is up to debate, as I'd argue they're too busy eating Doritos to be rational or irrational, but violent I would argue they are not. But I digress.
And, as for my opinion, my suggestion would be to take the picture and replace the caption with something to the effect of "Pippy Drunkstockings" or "Wendy's: Home of the Bathtub Martini."
If I owned the country, I'm not sure which i would do away with first, the Ad Council, Title IX, or the Dept of Education. Tough call.
Coppermine wrote:Just to clarify, originally I saw no picture. Nothing, nada. That's because I have the essential Firefox extension AdBlock Plus (filtered to allow FBC banners through, of course ). Ironically, turning off AdBlock shows, agast, an advertisement from, none other, than the good old "ad council," one of my favorite, misinformed public service announcement non-profit organizations.
Before I say anything, I'd just like to point out that the Ad Council is responsible for the ads, up to and including the 21st century, that depict "stoners" (aka, weed smokers) as violent and irrational. Whether or not they're irrational is up to debate, as I'd argue they're too busy eating Doritos to be rational or irrational, but violent I would argue they are not. But I digress.
And, as for my opinion, my suggestion would be to take the picture and replace the caption with something to the effect of "Pippy Drunkstockings" or "Wendy's: Home of the Bathtub Martini."
If I owned the country, I'm not sure which i would do away with first, the Ad Council, Title IX, or the Dept of Education. Tough call.
Title IX. Probably welfare first, but of those, I have to say Title IX.
These anti-drug/anti-alcohol commercials and ads do absolutely nothing. First of all, they're stupid and not even effective commercials- has anyone seen the one with the talking dog? What is that anyway? And people who do drugs and drink underage are probably just going to dismiss these ads anyway. There has to be another way to get their point across.
"Oh, that Lankford and McGee, the trio of 'em. They're a one-man wrecking crew."
sportsaddict wrote:These anti-drug/anti-alcohol commercials and ads do absolutely nothing. First of all, they're stupid and not even effective commercials- has anyone seen the one with the talking dog? What is that anyway? And people who do drugs and drink underage are probably just going to dismiss these ads anyway. There has to be another way to get their point across.
What an odd commercial. Maybe the dog should focus on her use of hallucinogens rather than the weed. Just saying.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by Old_Style » Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:21 pm 
). Ironically, turning off AdBlock shows, agast, an advertisement from, none other, than the good old "ad council," one of my favorite, misinformed public service announcement non-profit organizations. 
