Pujols/Zimmerman for Youkilis/Sheets? VETO?

[sox 06]

Should this be vetoed or does it look fine?

Pujols/Zimmerman FOR Youkilis/Sheets?

[Jimmy103]

Oh man that's a pretty bad deal considering Pujols/Zimm have been hitting the cover off the ball and Youk is undoubtedly going to cool off. I don't like to veto deals, but I'd have to say this one deserves it.


A lil help please:
viewtopic.php?t=301706

[Oatsdad]

It's badly lopsided, but I wouldn't veto it...

[sox 06]

The reason for my veto question is the team trading away Pujols just checked their team for the first time since April and the team getting Pujols already has Ryan Howard. I would think and even trade would have to be Pujols/someone for Howard/someone.

[CBMGreatOne]

If the Pujols team hasn't checked his team since April... VETO!!!

That's just terribly poor etiquette on his part, not to mention a terribly lopsided deal. Even if it was made with the best of intentions, I'd veto that. You can't join a league, get the first pick, take Pujols, draft and ditch, and then accept some crappy offer for him in June. That's not cool