Ursa wrote: Amazing Oopah wrote:
I wonder why Yahoo doesn't have this feature in its game for the general public. Their writers do but we don't
Yahoo is in need of a major upgrade of it's overall game. I have for the first time been using CBS in a league this year and it's so far in front of Yahoo it's not even a competition. I know we have a Yahoo FB insider on the board here and I mean no disrespect at all but the Yahoo game is looking very very tired. Adding the ^ to batting starters is nice but ultimately pointless when starters already are indicated by a row of zeroes next to them prior to first pitch. It's like adding a second rear view mirror to a car that has worn out tires.
In particular, the StatTracker needs a total rewrite to prevent it sucking up 50% of processor power - and, yes, I have a powerful computer.
I agree that there are plenty of things Yahoo should do to improve its fantasy interface.
However I played CBS last year and didnt like it. I loved some of the features that Yahoo doesn't have, but couldn't stand the overall way things worked. Lineup and player management is just so much easier on Yahoo its not even close. I'm sure its a matter of preference, but I left my CBS keeper (2nd place finish) because I just didn't want to use CBS any more. Yahoo all the way IMO.
I dont often bother with Stattracker. I agree it sucks, but I pay so I can see todays stats on the team page.