trade went through people complained afterwards, what to do

[trevizzle]

so there was a trade with some pretty big names, and it's a commishener veto league, and the policy for the league is 2 days waiting and if no one says anything then the trade goes through.

team A gets: Vladdy Daddy, Michael Cuddyer
team B gets: Hanley Ramirez, Paul Konerko

when i saw it i didnt think it was too bad considering han ram is probably the second best SS in the league

well the trade went through after 2 days, and no one said anything.

and yesterday 2 mangers came up saying they didnt like it. do i go back and change things? would that be unfair for the two trading teams, seeing as they cleard the waiting period. what do i do?

[Danger]

Nope. Those 2 managers just fell asleep at the button or something and rules are rules, they had 2 days to veto and it's their fault for not speaking up earlier. The trade doesn't look that bad in the first place.

[roncool11]

do not veto that even if they complained on time I wouldn't veto it

[dissent]

That's not even close to a vetoable trade.

[morphism]

That deal is definitely reasonable and should not be vetoed.

[JTWood]

Echoing the others' sentiments...

If you veto that, you are doing a disservice to your league.

[trevizzle]

i let it sit

[Lofunzo]

It went through the trade review process with nary a peep. The trade should stand.

[Chip1010]

Even if this weren't a perfectly fine trade -- and it is -- it's every owner's responsibility to abide by the league rules, as well as PAY ATTENTION. If two days pass and you don't see that a trade has been proposed, you're either asleep at the wheel or you need to change your e-mail options so you hear of trades immediately.

[The Loveable Losers]

Even if it was Ortiz for Ortiz (Ramon for David) I still don't undo it after people said nothing for two days. As it is, this deal is fair anyways...it shouldn't have been vetoed.