Secret Avatar wrote:"Guys projected for mid-rotation aren't generally good fantasy guys in their first couple seasons though. I'm holding onto him and playing him until he gets blown up though - then he's gone."
I don't disagree with that. My point was that he might be a solid mid-rotation guy NOW. He's been historically plagued by walks but, in the last few starts anyway, has walked very few. Maybe he just got lucky or maybe he turned the corner. If you've got a stacked fantasy rotation already, there's no need to speculate on Marshall. But if you don't, he's the sort of guy worth speculating on, IMO, especially since he was almost certainly undrafted and available for the price of an add-drop.
As a Cubs fan, I sure hope so. But I'm just not getting my hopes too high.
shawngee03 wrote:other than him spelling him name incorrectly,
How is "Sean Marshall" incorrect?
"I do not think baseball of today is any better than it was 30 years ago... I still think Radbourne is the greatest of the pitchers." John Sullivan 1914-Old athletes never change.
Could a Cubs fan explain the difference between Rich Hill and Sean Marshall to me? Obviously his command has been better this year so far, but in terms of pure stuff, they both have a quality left-handed fastball and a big curve. Mashall's fastball might even be a bit harder.
SmartassBoiler wrote:Could a Cubs fan explain the difference between Rich Hill and Sean Marshall to me? Obviously his command has been better this year so far, but in terms of pure stuff, they both have a quality left-handed fastball and a big curve. Mashall's fastball might even be a bit harder.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by Rounders » Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:50 pm 
