They don't let you use quality starts as a stat (which I would imagine many would use due to the luck that goes into getting a win), but they do have useless or rare stats like balks, shutouts, intentional walks, and batters grounding into double plays. Anyone know why Yahoo has this weird selection?
abrunn11... the place to go for all your sig needs...
Inukchuk
General Manager
Posts: 4011
(Past Year: 103)
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 335
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Coming down on this hospital like the hammer of Thor
I've been wondering the same thing. Our league uses CGs, but have been wanting to replace that lucky category w/ QS for a while now. Let's hope they get that stat in there for next year b/c we almost made the switch to ESPN for that ONE category.
I'd guess because 'quality start' is a bit subjective? I mean, what you personally would consider a quality start to be might not be the same for other players/managers.
Amazing Oopah wrote:I'd guess because 'quality start' is a bit subjective? I mean, what you personally would consider a quality start to be might not be the same for other players/managers.
Quality Start is not subjective. It's 6 IP or more, with 3 ER or less. That's it.
So what if a pitcher pitches 5 scoreless innings, but gets relieved due to a high pc or huge lead by his team (or even because his team needs the run and puts in a PH)?
angelo285 wrote:So what if a pitcher pitches 5 scoreless innings, but gets relieved due to a high pc or huge lead by his team (or even because his team needs the run and puts in a PH)?
It's not a Quality Start. Makes as much sense as the Hold stat.
Amazing Oopah wrote:I'd guess because 'quality start' is a bit subjective? I mean, what you personally would consider a quality start to be might not be the same for other players/managers.
Quality Start is not subjective. It's 6 IP or more, with 3 ER or less. That's it.
ding ding.
i cant believe people actually use complete games and shutouts