wrveres wrote:you would have rather had GORE?? If that was the case, Albert would still be trying to figure out what hit us? please ...
Those were the "Realistic Choices" given to you ..
I'm sure that you are referring to jive's statement but I repeat that too much credit goes to the president when things go well and too much blame when it doesn't. Do you really think that this war would be much different with Gore in office? A little at most. You make it sound like the president makes all of the decisions by themself. Do you really think that Bush looked at a map, with help of course, and said, "Bomb them"?
No one knew at the election that this would happen. I still find it a little funny that more people wanted Gore than Bush at the last election. It's amazing how the guy with the most votes lost. Oh well, another discussion, I guess. I'm not saying that he is or isn't doing a bad job. I just think that basing whether someone is worth the breath
by what is on a bumper sticker is very short-sighted.