Trade Vetoed (twice) - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2015 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Trade Vetoed (twice)

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Postby pangbones » Sun May 27, 2007 2:02 am

I don't see the other teams need for a closer. He has 3 good closers, and he won't finish last in saves, unless there are only 6 teams in the league.

I don't veto trades unless I think people are cheating, or I think the trade is so lopsided, it'll compromise the integrity of the league. I don't think it falls into the latter, I can't comment on the former though. I do think the other guy is fine with his closers.
Image
pangbones
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Fantasy Expert
Posts: 4337
Joined: 8 May 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Lansing, MI

Postby Tizzle » Sun May 27, 2007 9:58 am

Unfortunately people don't really understand the whole Veto process, and they use it as a tool to stop good teams for getting better especially if you are in 1st.
its gonna be AMAZIN'
Tizzle
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor


Posts: 50
Joined: 9 May 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Seanyfever » Sun May 27, 2007 12:47 pm

Some leagues are sure sensitive with veto. Nothing wrong with this.
Image
Expos... Gone, but not forgotten.
Seanyfever
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Response Team
Posts: 6751
(Past Year: 289)
Joined: 6 Apr 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Enjoying America's Pastime with a Canadian Beer!

Postby Fritzenhammer » Sun May 27, 2007 2:00 pm

no veto - avoid the dunderheads, and find a league with a decent commisioner who knows what to do.

FH
Fritzenhammer
College Coach
College Coach

User avatar

Posts: 222
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby SuperS1989 » Sun May 27, 2007 2:16 pm

I would have to agree with seanyfever. Unless its a disasterous trade, let managers manage according to their plan for the team
SuperS1989
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 189
Joined: 9 May 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Trade Vetoed (twice)

Postby 5 » Tue May 29, 2007 1:12 pm

DMXdawg wrote:This is the trade:
I get: Morneau
I give: Estrada and K-rod
He desperate needs saves and his catcher is carlos ruiz. It makes sense for both sides.

Mob rule (twice) vetoed the trade and I'm really angry. It seems like I can't trade at all! :-t


There's nothing wrong with that trade. What's the problem? Your league has some women in it, that's all.
5
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2296
Joined: 24 Feb 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Lofunzo » Wed May 30, 2007 1:52 am

JTWood wrote:Your league needs to understand that the only reason to veto should be collusion. If they think you guys are working together for some lopsided benefit to one party, then the trade should be vetoed. Otherwise, they are dictating value, and we all know that value is like beauty. It's in the eye of the beholder.


I used to think that way but have since expanded my thinking to include trades that will greatly affect the balance of the league (ie. completely stupid trades). This doesn't qualify for either, IMHO.
Image
Lofunzo
Moderator
Moderator

User avatar
ModeratorCafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe RankerEagle EyeHockey ModPick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 23698
(Past Year: 11)
Joined: 9 Jul 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Central Jersey

Previous

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact