Simulacrum wrote:I just saw an article in Injuries and Player Updates that says the Yanks are considering voiding his contract... if they're actually thinking of doing that, why wouldn't they consider a trade as well?
Nice void the guy for telling the truth let the rest of the league get away scot free.
Giambi is still a pretty significant piece of the Yankee offense. Why are they trying so hard to get rid of him? Or is this just a media story for a slow day?
slomo007 wrote:Giambi is still a pretty significant piece of the Yankee offense. Why are they trying so hard to get rid of him? Or is this just a media story for a slow day?
Slow day I think.
Giambi is important to this offense. I don't see them moving him because all they could get is junk.
Simulacrum wrote:I just saw an article in Injuries and Player Updates that says the Yanks are considering voiding his contract... if they're actually thinking of doing that, why wouldn't they consider a trade as well?
If the Yankees void Giambi's contract, they should also have to void all otheir TV contracts. Do you really believe the Yankees didn't know he was on steroids before they signed him or even after his somewhat apology. Once again, hypocracy reigns.
I thought don't ask, don't tell was in reference to gays in the military!
Oh well, I never liked the Yankees anyway.
The glass is neither half full nor half empty... It is simply a glass
how about giambi for joe saunders and scot shields? now that might help them out alittle more. i assume the angels could get more for ervin, thats why i didnt mention him.
Simulacrum wrote:I just saw an article in Injuries and Player Updates that says the Yanks are considering voiding his contract... if they're actually thinking of doing that, why wouldn't they consider a trade as well?
If the Yankees void Giambi's contract, they should also have to void all otheir TV contracts. Do you really believe the Yankees didn't know he was on steroids before they signed him or even after his somewhat apology. Once again, hypocracy reigns.
I thought don't ask, don't tell was in reference to gays in the military! Oh well, I never liked the Yankees anyway.
Why the heck would they have to void TV contracts? That makes no sense. How is that even related?
Simulacrum wrote:I just saw an article in Injuries and Player Updates that says the Yanks are considering voiding his contract... if they're actually thinking of doing that, why wouldn't they consider a trade as well?
If the Yankees void Giambi's contract, they should also have to void all otheir TV contracts. Do you really believe the Yankees didn't know he was on steroids before they signed him or even after his somewhat apology. Once again, hypocracy reigns.
I thought don't ask, don't tell was in reference to gays in the military! Oh well, I never liked the Yankees anyway.
That's a quality post right there. Are the Yankees the only team giving contracts to known users?? Don't think so. He seems to be breaking down and they might be looking into their options. I see no fault in that. Also, that is pretty ironic coming from a Giants fan with Bonds in your sig.
Personally, I think that the Post has the best sports page. Sure, they reach but that's the entire paper.
no thread .. ?
Interesting for those that don't know ..
Yahoo wrote:Jason Giambi failed an amphetamines test within the last year, the Daily News reported Wednesday. The newspaper did not cite any sources in its report.