Snakes Gould wrote:this isnt meant to be disrespectful at all, but i sense some ballot stuffing going on by friends (not that it really matters, since this is all for fun) but there's really only 3 sigs that i feel should be garnering any sort of votes whatsoever. just my two cents
yeah i agree with you SG that there are at least 3 sigs worthy of winning. Too bad if we have a winner just coz he got a lot of friends voting for his sig. ugh. maybe invite the sigs artists at the football side to vote.
If you want to make a thread over there that'd be great to get more votes.
I'm not necessarily sure of friend voting but maybe people voting for their favorite person instead. Also people who make sigs look at them differently than people who don't so that's also a reason, which is fine as we want everyone to vote that can.
teddy brought up a good point there, people who dont make sigs see things differently, possibly more objectively. When Im evaluating a sig, i tend to pick which is more difficult to make, rather than what looks better
Idahofan1
Minor League Mentor
Posts: 637
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Bases this season: 0
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: GM headquarters of the Rubber game's brooklyn dodgers
Idahofan1 wrote:teddy brought up a good point there, people who dont make sigs see things differently, possibly more objectively. When Im evaluating a sig, i tend to pick which is more difficult to make, rather than what looks better
see what i think looks better are ones where i can see attention to detail, good use of text, etc...im sure everyone looks at sigs differently, thats why i dont really mind.
sportsguy138 wrote:How would they know who made what sig? I thought they were suppose to be hosted on image shack so people wouldn't know.
They don't know. If you were referring to what I said I meant favorite person within the sig, like a Mets fan (:-]) might vote for a Willie Randolph sig because they like him, not because it's the best sig.