Anthony Reyes- Bad or unlucky? - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Anthony Reyes- Bad or unlucky?

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Anthony Reyes- Bad or unlucky?

Postby jfg » Sun May 13, 2007 9:39 pm

I'd say a little bit of both but I think he's going to be very good by the time this season is over. He hasn't given up more than 4 runs yet this season but at the same time he hasn't gone past the 6th inning once. Once he can get his pitch count down and start getting some run support I think he'll be a good 3rd starter. Am I wrong?
Image
jfg
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicGolden Eagle EyeMatchup Meltdown SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly WinnerTrivia Time Trial Monthly Winner
Posts: 6078
(Past Year: 85)
Joined: 4 Nov 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby sportsaddict » Sun May 13, 2007 10:57 pm

Reyes has a few things he needs to sort out, but he is not as bad as his record indicates. The deal with Reyes is he throws too many pitches and labors out on the mound. He never lasts more than 6 innings... usually 5-6 is what he maxes out at. However, he's not getting rocked out there, and he keeps the Cards in games... the offense is just absolutely terrible right now so he can't get anything to show for it. He's going to get better with time, I think at the end of the year he'll have around 10 wins with a 4.00-4.50 ERA...
"Oh, that Lankford and McGee, the trio of 'em. They're a one-man wrecking crew."

-Mike Shannon
sportsaddict
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1961
Joined: 2 Aug 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The good old Midwest

Postby jealousblues » Sun May 13, 2007 11:01 pm

someone said this about him


"Reyes 0-6 despite
Never giving up more the 4 runs... And giving up 3 or less in 4 of his 6 starts..

Going to scream now...

"


I think Reyes run support is the worst in baseball. I heard he gets a little more than one run a game on average.

they also said (on tv today) that the Cards have scored 8 runs in his last 7 starts (not including post season).

I dont think his WHIP is that bad
JH32
jealousblues
General Manager
General Manager

Eagle Eye
Posts: 2471
Joined: 6 Apr 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby rentz » Mon May 14, 2007 1:24 pm

I dropped reyes, I got tired of having to worry about starting him.
I figure he'll sit on the fa wire a while.....he was going to be my big sleeper pitcher
rentz
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 4810
Joined: 3 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Ender » Mon May 14, 2007 1:28 pm

Unlucky, he's been solid except for walking a few too many 3 BB/9 and a 58% LOB rate which isn't really sustainable. If his strand rate matched his career rate (including the 58% so far this year) he'd have an ERA of 4.15 which seems to pretty closely match his FIP of 3.92.

On the other hand he's not going to go deep into games most of the time and the Cardinals are a legitamitely bad team, not just on a cold streak. So he's probably going to have problems getting wins.
Ender
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

CafeholicFantasy Expert
Posts: 7733
Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby jealousblues » Mon May 14, 2007 2:29 pm

the elephant in the room
By lboros
Posted on Mon May 14, 2007 at 08:05:20 AM EDT

did you know the cardinals have hit 1 homerun --- one --- in the 12 games since josh hancock died? did you know they've averaged only 6.3 hits per game over that span? only 1.1 extra-base hits a game?

the cards haven't hit well at any point this season, but before hancock died the offense was merely struggling. now it's asphyxiating. the cardinals scored an average of 3.5 runs a game in the 23 games before hancock's death; they've averaged 2.4 runs in the 12 contests since. more details of the sad before-and-after:

G R HR AVG OBP SLG
cards thru 4/28 23 81 16 .249 .310 .360
cards since 4/28 12 29 1 .203 .281 .243


before hancock died they had been outscored by a run a game (81-104); since then, they've been outscored by almost two runs a game (29-55). before he died, the cardinals' batting line was almost indistinguishable from their opponents':

AB H 2B 3B HR AVG OBP SLG Base
Runs
cardinals thru 4/28 780 194 33 3 16 .249 .310 .360 89
opponents thru 4/28 784 193 34 8 21 .246 .312 .390 99


the only meaningful difference was that opponents had outhomered st louis by 5; the cards were 10-13 in that stretch, a pretty accurate gauge of their performance up to that time. now compare the lines since hancock died:

AB H 2B 3B HR AVG OBP SLG Base
Runs
cardinals since 4/28 374 76 12 0 1 .203 .281 .243 27
opponents since 4/28 401 103 28 1 9 .257 .322 .399 55


they are getting their brains beat in. they're defenseless. in half the games since hancock died, the cardinals have lost by 5 runs or more; in the other half they are 5-1. they are quite literally hanging on by their nails. but how long before that tenuous grip finally breaks? seems like it's already happening, if edmonds' postgame comments are to be believed. a story in this morning's post-dispatch ends like this: "Reminded that this team used to make relentlessness its trademark during 100- and 105-win seasons in 2004 and 2005, Edmonds said flatly, 'This is a different team.'" matt leach's story at the cards' official site also concludes with an edmonds quote: "Things are sliding."

after their first game post-hancock (a 7-1 loss to milwaukee), i mused: "the cardinals already were unsure of themselves before [hancock's death] happened, already equipped with thin reserves; i'm sure we'd like to see them 'dig down deep' or whatever the cliché is, but there isn't a lot of depth to mine." to my eye, the cards' discouraging effort in the month of may is very obviously a direct consequence of what happened on the next to last day of april. let me be clear about this: i'm not trying to make excuses for the team, nor suggesting that we should accept lifeless play because the team is grieving. i'm merely trying to understand what's happening --- trying to understand why a team that was struggling but still battling in april can now be so easily beaten. we're not supposed to talk about it; the cardinals don't want pity, nor even sympathy. but i think --- speaking without pity, without sympathy; just stating what i see --- that whatever sense of resolve the cardinals carried into the season got kicked to the curb on april 29. these are tough guys, mentally tough --- tough enough to win game 7 vs the mets last year, and to come back against clemens in game 7 of 2004; tough enough to survive, 1 out from elimination, and make the astros earn their pennant in 2005.

but man, do they look tired. they look weary. edmonds is right; it's not the same team.

here are some other slice-n-dice statistical oddities of the season:

the cards now stand 1-9 in "revenge" games --- that is, games against teams they beat in last year's playoffs (mets, padres) or against starting pitchers they chose not to re-sign (marquis, suppan). in those 10 games they have scored 13 runs (or 1.3 per game) to their opponents' 51; they're getting outscored by nearly 4 runs a game. three revenge games vs the tigers loom this weekend . . . .
corollary to the preceding: the cardinals have a winning record in non-revenge games (14-11), despite being outscored 97-108 in those games.
against opponents that, as of today, have a winning record, st louis is 2-12; they have been outscored 70-29 in those games, an average deficit of 2.9 runs. against opponents who currently stand at .500 or below, the cards are 13-8 --- again, despite having been outscored in those games (81-89).
in games where they have allowed more than 2 runs, the cardinals are 2-20. that's not a typo: 2 wins, 20 losses when they allow more than 2 runs. they're 13-0 when they hold the opposition to 2 runs or less.
in the 7 games started by anthony reyes, the cardinals have hit .178, slugged .205, and scored 8 runs; only 4 of those runs scored while reyes was still in the game. they have produced just 4 extra-base hits (3 doubles and a homer) in his starts. in all other games, they are batting .247 and slugging .351.
reyes didn't pitch great yesterday, but as always he contained the damage and kept the team within striking distance. and that's all the cards are hoping to do at this point --- contain the damage, stay in the game, keep it close enough that they still have a chance.



thats from vivaelbirdos.com
JH32
jealousblues
General Manager
General Manager

Eagle Eye
Posts: 2471
Joined: 6 Apr 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Fugetaboutit » Mon May 14, 2007 2:54 pm

Im gonna hold him for a while longer. With a WHIP that low, the ERA has to come down and the Cardinals cant possibly be this bad. He can still get 12 wins with good K rates. He has the rest of this month to prove himself to me.
Fugetaboutit
College Coach
College Coach

User avatar

Posts: 123
Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball


Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], scarnicease and 7 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Saturday, Sep. 20
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

LA Dodgers at Chi Cubs
(1:05 pm)
Detroit at Kansas City
(1:05 pm)
Toronto at NY Yankees
(4:05 pm)
Philadelphia at Oakland
(4:05 pm)
Arizona at Colorado
(4:10 pm)
Boston at Baltimore
(7:05 pm)
Milwaukee at Pittsburgh
(7:05 pm)
Chi White Sox at Tampa Bay
(7:10 pm)
indoors
Cleveland at Minnesota
(7:10 pm)
Washington at Miami
(7:10 pm)
indoors
Seattle at Houston
(7:10 pm)
NY Mets at Atlanta
(7:10 pm)
Cincinnati at St. Louis
(7:15 pm)
San Francisco at San Diego
(8:40 pm)
Texas at LA Angels
(9:05 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact