by Coppermine » Sun May 06, 2007 9:19 am
RawTalent wrote:StringerBell wrote:Coppermine wrote:TheDooner64 wrote:
What's everyone's obsession with having 4 or more closers? I've never won a league with that much cheese... a good starter is far more valuable.
Starters will almost never get you a save.
Is the word "almost" necessary here

Hey! Don't misquote me... stringerbell said it
I personally can't rationalize having more than 3 closers on the team and that has to do with the draft... I feel like I can get more valuable players in the rounds that closers typically get scooped up, which in many leagues I've been in, have been way too early. I don't like jumping on the closer-run bandwagon and I usually win my leagues for avoiding it while some guy who wasted 4 picks in a row on upper tier closers toils away in last place because he doesn't have a catcher, a second baseman or a pitcher who can win games.
If you're a battery, you're either working or you're dead....