1 to 5 it is either the A's or the Yankees depending on the success or Leiber/Contreras and Harden/Redman. Boston with Wakefield and Kim ...come on. Cubbies 5th is weak. Same for the Astros.
The A's have the best 1- 5 rotation hands down while for second best they are all 1 pitcher shy of having dominating roatation and the are they yanks, cubs, and astros you could make a case for either 3 of those teams for 2nd best but imo i just call them all tied for the 2nd best. opps i forgot to add red sox to the list lol.
Last edited by swingaway on Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TheYanks04 wrote:Boston with Wakefield and Kim ...come on. Cubbies 5th is weak.
I think you underestimate Kim's ability (and maybe forever associate Kim with his 2001 W.S. meltdown). I think he's better suited for starting now, and I believe he'd make for a very good starter if he was given a full season.
And I guess I don't see Wakefield as being so easily dismissed. Career .253 BAA versus Lieber's .271? And who knows where Lieber's at now....I'll take the Sox because of their five starters.
And Harden is still unproven, and Redman is more of a product of his environment, IMO.
Part of my reasoning has to do with degree of question marks for each rotation. Depending on how things play out, these 6 could end up in any order by the end of the season. I really like that A's rotation though ...
And the M's rotation could end up in the mix too ...
"The game has a cleanness. If you do a good job, the numbers say so. You don't have to ask anyone or play politics. You don't have to wait for the reviews." - Sandy Koufax