Is this Zambrano trade vetoable?

[joemorgan]

Some extremely impatient guy in my league is freaking out on our league message board saying hes sick of Zambrano and doesnt want him....so I start out small and offer him solely Ted Lilly straight up for Zambrano....Amazingly he accepts it without even trying to negotiate something better with me, which I probably wouldve done and was expecting to do.

So there are a couple manager in our league(non keeper) who are saying this is unfair and should be vetoed. Im just saying Im buying low on Zambrano from a guy whos panicking and offering up a Ted LIlly whos off to a great start to them.

Do you guys think this should be vetoed?

[Pablo975]

Nope. Not vetoable.

The other guy is insane to let CZam go, but managers making stupid decisions are part of the game. Vetos are to be used when collusion is going on.

The only way I might veto this is if the manager was a first time fantasy player who knew no better.

[CBMGreatOne]

Ted Lilly is off to so much better of a start than Zambrano, that even though it's early I'd say no veto. I think it's a pretty bad trade, but Lilly looks legit this year.

[teddy ballgame]

Not vetoable, but clearly a very lopsided deal.