Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **2muchchalk** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:05 pm

Team A
gets
·Beckett, Josh SP BOS
·Dunn, Adam LF CIN

Team B gets
·Berkman, Lance 1B HOU
·Zambrano, Carlos SP CHC

i don't think this is a veto situation. i have to approve it. What do uthink. i think team b is getting a better deal but, i dont' think i can vote it down.
WHIR

by **FantasyBandit** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:57 pm

Yes team b is getting the better end. But tough to veto that.

by **CruiseJD** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:21 am

No veto IMO.

by **gws226** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:24 am

Thanks for the input on mine.

Thats not vetoable.

by **CBMGreatOne** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:05 pm

No veto, though team a will be sorry.

by **dca5627** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:34 pm

Adam Dunn has started off decently solid and so has beckett but i think overall for team B this will be a slightly better deal especially if Berkman gets heated up

by **las_vegas_keith** » Thu Apr 19, 2007 3:32 pm

It's not a great deal but in no way is it worthy of a veto. Really there should only be a veto if there is cheating. I mean if someone really likes some players they should be able to handle their team. They might have a feeling that in the end proves their side wins out in the trade.

by **pangbones** » Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:34 pm

I'll assume the scoring is standard 5*5. I don't think you can veto that, but man Team A is probably not going to like the results of this at the end of the year!! :-t

by **Pablo975** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 12:27 am

Nah, not vetoable. :-t

by **thaklanksta** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:14 pm

Looks fair to me.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

fair deal

fair deal

Who is online