Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **s221506** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:47 pm

Never vetoed a trade before! But this can't stand, right?

Berkman/Kazmir

for

Helton :-?

by **CBMGreatOne** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

I can't imagine what quirky league settings would raise Helton's value enough such that a Berkman owner would feel he needed to add something to HIS side to make up the difference. Yeah, this one's a veto, you have to draw the line somewhere. It's probably collusive in the first place.

by **BTOWNHESS** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:24 pm

it takes a lot for me to veto a trade or say a trade is vetoable. And yes this one by all accounts is very vetoable.

by **Hobbes** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:58 pm

BTOWNHESS wrote:it takes a lot for me to veto a trade or say a trade is vetoable. And yes this one by all accounts is very vetoable.

I agree.

by **Taters** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:00 pm

As much as I hate to police peoples stupidty, you have to. For the good of the league you have to draw the line. :-Â°

by **thaklanksta** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:35 pm

COLLUSION

No way either team should feel this one would slip through the cracks.

by **pangbones** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:19 am

This one needs to be vetoed!! That will ruin a league!!!

by **teddy ballgame** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:22 am

Yeah there's really no explanation for that unless the guy stepped out of a time warp from 2001.

by **las_vegas_keith** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:27 pm

Wow. I mean I think most trades should go through and people should be able to do what they want with their team, but this trade is so horrible I can't even think how this could ever be fair.

I mean Berkman for Helton is bad enough with out throwing in the free Kazmir.

An easy veto

by **Crippler** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:35 pm

Unless you mis-typed and Kazmir was on the other side, I suspect collusion.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Veto?

Veto?

Who is online