Return to Commissioner's Corner
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by Jschmuck2 » Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:24 pm
Done.
Last edited by Jschmuck2 on Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jschmuck2
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 410
- Joined: 15 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by ABA316 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:34 am
Tough to say without knowing the format. I like the Guerrero side of it better but not sure it's a vetoable trade.
Course if it's a keeper trade it looks a little less fair, but again still probly not terrible enough to be a veto.
-
ABA316
- Minor League Mentor

/snoopy.gif)
- Posts: 736
- (Past Year: 11)
- Joined: 24 Aug 2006
- Bases this season: 63
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Dislexic Irishman » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:28 pm
I would say it's vetoable. I was offered Johan for my Vlad in one league and wound up getting Johan / Hunter for Vlad / Olsen.
Vlad is worth way more than that
-
Dislexic Irishman
- Major League Manager

/charlie2.gif)

- Posts: 1233
- Joined: 23 Aug 2004
- Bases this season: 4
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Jschmuck2 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:18 pm
Last edited by Jschmuck2 on Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jschmuck2
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 410
- Joined: 15 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by FantasyBandit » Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:24 pm
Jschmuck2 wrote:Granderson/Glavine for Guerrero??
Wait...what?
Granted, the Guerrero side is in desperate need of pitching...but still.
Vlad a 1st rounder. The other two from 14th rd to 17th rd selections. A pitcher like peavy,oswalt and so on for vlad. Your not crazy veto that!!!!!!!!!
-
FantasyBandit
- College Coach


- Posts: 170
- Joined: 20 Mar 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by bwagner112 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:07 pm
That should be vetoed in a second...regardless of format, unless you get penalized for HRs and RBIs
-
bwagner112
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 835
- Joined: 30 Apr 2005
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
- Location: Rounding third and getting ready to truck Varitek
by Jschmuck2 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:53 pm
Yahoo is going to review it...how does that usually work??
-
Jschmuck2
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 410
- Joined: 15 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by jdsun1 » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:55 pm
Jschmuck2 wrote:Yahoo is going to review it...how does that usually work??
If its a public league there is such thing as a fair play policy and you can send them an email with the league info and the situationa dn they will veto it and then send you an email about it. The turnaround time is about 20-30 minutes and usually they veto it. This one would definately get veteod if you protested to yahoo about it.
-
jdsun1
- Major League Manager

- Posts: 1075
- Joined: 5 May 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Jschmuck2 » Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:07 am
It's a private league and I'm the commish. I set it so Yahoo could only shoot down a bad trade... I didn't want anyone to feel that I was being biased.
I filed a protest with Yahoo and hopefully they'll do something about it.
Anyone had experience with that before?
-
Jschmuck2
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 410
- Joined: 15 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Jschmuck2 » Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:29 pm
Now the Guerrero owner has dropped D. Lee and M. Ensberg to waivers for seemingly no reason. Lockout?
-
Jschmuck2
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 410
- Joined: 15 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Commissioner's Corner
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests