Definitely Longoria, hands down. He's got huge potential, as much (and some say more) than Alex Gordon.
Wood has a long swing and strikes out a ton. ML pitching will exploit that weakness and for that reason I don't see him being the superstar many others seem to think he'll be. Think Troy Glaus, IMO. He'll be good but not as good as Longoria.
burntfaceman wrote:Definitely Longoria, hands down. He's got huge potential, as much (and some say more) than Alex Gordon.
Wood has a long swing and strikes out a ton. ML pitching will exploit that weakness and for that reason I don't see him being the superstar many others seem to think he'll be. Think Troy Glaus, IMO. He'll be good but not as good as Longoria.
ditto
Are you interested in joining a 28 teams dynasty league? If so, PM me.
by 05worldserieschamps » Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:05 am
I think there is little doubt at all that Longoria will be the better hitter, but Wood might hit more HR. But even if he does, which is a big IF. Longoria easy.
Is pushing for President Obama to pass a law requiring all citizens to be Chicago White Sox fans and make October 1st "White Sox Day" where we all dress as our favorite player. It maybe socialist, but I don't care.
bigken117 wrote:I would say Longoria is "safer" until Wood can cut down his K's, but Wood has more upside.
Wood has huge power upside. Huge. He has the best raw power of all prospects (including Butler, Young, ect) and if he fills out his skinny frame...look out.
He is a Alfosono Soriano type player (with more power upside and less speed, think 20-25 steals instead of 40). He is does not have the build of a Adam Dunn, but still generates massive power.
"I do not think baseball of today is any better than it was 30 years ago... I still think Radbourne is the greatest of the pitchers." John Sullivan 1914-Old athletes never change.
i'd highly call Longorias power weak either. the guy is possibly right next to or just behind Wood in that area but he hits for higher average and doesnt K nearly as much.