Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **Y`s Guy** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:04 am

Help me out here...I see that the Rangers are getting hammered with ridicule here. Why is this?

True, Hicks has the IQ of a piece of lettuce and failed to trade ARod to the Red Sox. In waiting to trade him they were unable to make moves and now have to get scraps off the dung heap.

Now, before the two recent additions,if you were to look at the offense can you name a Ranger not named ARod, Texiera, Blalock or Young? If you said Mench then you get a star. But then who do they got? Jordan and Dellucci will help this team.

The pitching moves must be coming. They have a top closer. And as for SPs...the dung heap is barren.

by **bell** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:09 am

Y`s Guy wrote:Help me out here...I see that the Rangers are getting hammered with ridicule here. Why is this?

True, Hicks has the IQ of a piece of lettuce and failed to trade ARod to the Red Sox. In waiting to trade him they were unable to make moves and now have to get scraps off the dung heap.

Now, before the two recent additions,if you were to look at the offense can you name a Ranger not named ARod, Texiera, Blalock or Young? If you said Mench then you get a star. But then who do they got? Jordan and Dellucci will help this team.

The pitching moves must be coming. They have a top closer. And as for SPs...the dung heap is barren.

I think they are getting ridiculed for exactly what you said in the red highlights. Everyone here keeps saying that same line, yet what do they do? They sign more positional players. Once again their starting rotation is going to be comprised of scraps.

by **wrveres** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:11 am

tomko ... estes .. ae all still avail.... ;-)

by **bell** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:14 am

wrveres wrote:tomko ... estes .. ae all still avail....

Yeah, sorry we took Sparks and Reynolds from ya Mad. I know you were looking to solidify your rotation with top-notch starters.

by **Y`s Guy** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:14 am

Weren't they hot for Kenny Rogers? No, not the singer.

by **wrveres** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:19 am

they are still trying to figure out why Roger won't throw for them .. I agree, what ever pitchers that are left ... who wants ..

I mean ya think Hicks and Boras could come to some sort of agreement on Millwood? Hell no. Scott is going to get him 12-14 mill in arbitration.

Who else is left ... ?

by **Madison** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:41 am

Here's a wild one for everyone. :-B

The Rangers have good hitting and zero pitching...........

The A's have good pitching and zero hitting (not including Chavez) .......

I know it wouldn't make a lot of sense, but............

by **wrveres** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:42 am

Madison wrote:Here's a wild one for everyone.

The Rangers have good hitting and zero pitching...........

The A's have good pitching and zero hitting (not including Chavez) .......

I know it wouldn't make a lot of sense, but............

yeah dream on ... :-D

by **DieHardCubbie** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 1:50 am

wrveres wrote:
Madison wrote:Here's a wild one for everyone.

The Rangers have good hitting and zero pitching...........

The A's have good pitching and zero hitting (not including Chavez) .......

I know it wouldn't make a lot of sense, but............

yeah dream on ...

It is collusion I tell ya....collusion.... :-b

by **Madison** » Tue Dec 30, 2003 2:00 am

DieHardCubbie wrote:
wrveres wrote:
Madison wrote:Here's a wild one for everyone.

The Rangers have good hitting and zero pitching...........

The A's have good pitching and zero hitting (not including Chavez) .......

I know it wouldn't make a lot of sense, but............

yeah dream on ...

It is collusion I tell ya....collusion....

Lol.

We'll see. ;-)

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Rangers, at it agian. (lol)

Who is online