Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **angels7777** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:19 pm

Ortiz, Freel, Burrell,B. Roberts for Saito,Glavine,Kinsler,Ordonez?

Is this trade vetoable? Is seems very shady to me how someone can give up a 1st rounder and not get anyone close in value in return?

by **teddy ballgame** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:15 pm

That's vetoable. All those guys alone isn't enough for Ortiz, let alone and Freel, Burrell, and Roberts.

by **KCollins1304** » Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:40 pm

Ortiz and Roberts are far away the best talent in this deal, shoot it down :-t

by **Tigerfan** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:14 am

Only way it should go through is if you're talking about Ramon Ortiz!

by **Seanyfever** » Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:49 pm

Ugly. As in deep south ugly! :-t

by **Pablo975** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:19 pm

Hey, I'm from the deep south! :*)

But, I am ugly.

Yeah, that smells of some collusion. Veto it.

by **ihballer34** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:09 pm

VETO!!! AND RAMON ORTIZ IS STILL TO GOOD FOR THAT TRADE

by **mak1277** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:51 pm

I'm about as anti-veto as you can get...but this should be vetoed.

by **angels7777** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:18 am

should this trade be vetoed even with Kinsler's hot start?

by **CBMGreatOne** » Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:20 pm

Kinsler is good, but come on. David Ortiz is worth a lot more than he is. The remaining talent is comparable, but that's too big a limb to step out onto.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Ortiz, Freel, Burrell,B. Roberts for Saito,Glavine,Kinsler,O

Ortiz, Freel, Burrell,B. Roberts for Saito,Glavine,Kinsler,O

Who is online