Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **acsguitar** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:49 pm

davidmarver wrote:
BGbootha wrote:Exactly, its the hipocrasy of the thing that I love. It was Newt who was leading the fight against Clinton for humpin, and now we find out that Newt was humpin as well.

But Newt never lied under oath. That's where Clinton really errored in Newt's mind. Newt and Clinton may both be cheaters, but only one of them became a criminal in the process.

Grrrrr..... current president criminal cocaine drunk driver grrrr

by **The Loveable Losers** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:35 pm

Pogotheostrich wrote:
knapplc wrote:Seriously, though - how can Newt Gingrich be considered a viable candidate for the presidency? The guy can't possibly have a chance, can he?

Reublican voters love him. But in the National election I don't think he'd have a chance. He has the same problem as Hillary IMO. For the majority of Americans their opinions on Hillary and Newt are already formed and nothing is going to change them.

Yeah, I can't see how either one of them have the chance at winning. You have to get some of the people that don't have an opinion and you're just not going to do that when you're as polarizing as these two have been.

Big Pimpin wrote:I'm not going to advocate anything Newt did, nor does this mean that I like/respect/would vote for him. But the big difference is that while what Newt did is wrong and immoral, what Bill did was illegal. Having an affair in and of itself isn't against the law. Lying under oath is.

Absolutely. Clinton should have been in trouble with people for what he did. Newt wasn't just going after him about the lying under oath though...he was attacking him on moral grounds as well which definitely makes him a hypocrite here.

All that said Clinton shouldn't have been in trouble anyways because he never should have been questioned on a civil matter like that under oath. The office of the presidency is far more important than getting to the bottom of whether the man in office can't keep his pants on. The courts never should have forced him to testify and their decision caused more damage to the country than the actions of anyone else involved.

by **Coppermine** » Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:41 pm

by **Dan Lambskin** » Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:08 pm

Coppermine wrote:

i dont know...looks like a salamander to me ;-7

by **soxfan364** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:07 pm

All politicians lie, you can just bet on it. It just pisses me off when guys like Newt take the high moral ground but they're just as guilty (and human) as anyone else.

by **soxfan364** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 1:10 pm

Definetely a better baseball owner than President....

Big Pimpin wrote:And I'm not just a Bush defender. I do like the guy, but I don't think he's a very good president.

by 5 » Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:03 pm

soxfan364 wrote:All politicians lie, you can just bet on it. It just pisses me off when guys like Newt take the high moral ground but they're just as guilty (and human) as anyone else.

Oh there's a lot of that going on. The "Pro-family" group is pretty comical if you think about it. Anti-gay...gays. Pro-family...adulterers. Gotta love it.

by **Art Vandelay** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:07 pm

soxfan364 wrote:All politicians lie

Not under oath.

by 5 » Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:09 pm

Art Vandelay wrote:
soxfan364 wrote:All politicians lie

Not under oath.

you mean b/c they use Scooters as fall guys?

by **BGbootha** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 3:37 pm

5 wrote:
Art Vandelay wrote:
soxfan364 wrote:All politicians lie

Not under oath.

you mean b/c they use Scooters as fall guys?

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Newt didn't hate bill, he idolized him...

Re: Newt didn't hate bill, he idolized him...

Who is online