Prior and Wood or Pedro and Schilling which duo is better - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Prior and Wood or Pedro and Schilling which duo is better

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Postby Nomar4prez » Tue Dec 02, 2003 7:39 pm

Like him or hate him(I prefer to like him), Pedro is one of the best pitchers MLB has seen in a long time. He has the best win ratio of anyone currently pitching and his career ERA is as low as some of the all-time greats, even in this day of pro-hitter. With that being said, I still think Pedro is better than Prior and will continue to be for the next 2-3 years.
[url]http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/stats/player.php?id=453973[/url]
Going to huge someday.
Nomar4prez
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2198
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Red Sox Nation

Re: Yep

Postby Transmogrifier » Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:13 pm

HOOTIE wrote:A = Pedro B = Prior

Fact, Pedro displayed a lower era, 2.22 versus 2.43, in a higher scoring environement (al with dh), 4.71 versus 4.43. Show me evidence Prior is better?



Ah, Hootie... again you present one of the simplest, most compelling arguments.
I'm back. Sorta.

Do not boo Johnny.
Transmogrifier
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeSweet 16 Survivor
Posts: 7181
Joined: 17 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: No taxation without Representation!

Postby timkell » Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:28 pm

I don't think the Sox would make that trade at all. They clearly want to win next year. If they want to win next year, they want Schilling and Pedro.
timkell
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 680
Joined: 12 May 2002
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The House that Ruth Built

Postby HOOTIE » Tue Dec 02, 2003 8:49 pm

timkell wrote:I don't think the Sox would make that trade at all. They clearly want to win next year. If they want to win next year, they want Schilling and Pedro.


You are probably right. Boston wants to win now. I was thinking of it in a age and salary context, without regard to now.
Smells Like Teen Spirit
HOOTIE
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe Ranker
Posts: 15115
(Past Year: 297)
Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Pearl Jam country, right next door to Nirvana, Soundgarden, and Alice in Chains.

Postby Erboes » Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:12 pm

Pedro's an interesting case. Despite his stellar ERA and win/loss records, his domination has been slipping for a while. His WHIP is the highest since '98 (1.04, which should tell you how good that guy has been), as is his K's per 9 innings ratio. He's giving up more hits, his domination ratio has dropped nearly in half, and he's losing his unbeatable aura. The guy's the best pitcher I've ever seen, but I'm curious to see how much, if at all, he drops further this upcoming season. I have no predictions here, just observations.
Erboes
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1433
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Erboes » Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:19 pm

Looking at Pedro's career stats, I have a question. Up into '97 with the Expos Martinez was a good pitcher. ERA of mid to upper 3's, WHIP of around 1.15, and about a K an inning, then, BAM!, he becomes "Pedro". Does anyone know if this was because he learned the changeup? Or perhaps there was something else involved. Any knowledgable responses would be appreciated.
Erboes
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1433
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby HOOTIE » Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:25 pm

Erboes wrote:Looking at Pedro's career stats, I have a question. Up into '97 with the Expos Martinez was a good pitcher. ERA of mid to upper 3's, WHIP of around 1.15, and about a K an inning, then, BAM!, he becomes "Pedro". Does anyone know if this was because he learned the changeup? Or perhaps there was something else involved. Any knowledgable responses would be appreciated.


Just a guess, but he entered 97 at age 25. He began the year with 671 career innings. Perhaps he just matured? There's a school of thought that believes pitchers in general need 500 innings in, to harnish their stuff.
Smells Like Teen Spirit
HOOTIE
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
CafeholicResponse TeamFantasy ExpertCafe Ranker
Posts: 15115
(Past Year: 297)
Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Pearl Jam country, right next door to Nirvana, Soundgarden, and Alice in Chains.

Zany

Postby The Cow » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:44 pm

Now this may sound crazy, but that Pedro for the Expos sounds a whole lot like that Wood guy for the Cubs. But there is no chance Wood improves, right??? Can't be done, players do not improve, past stats are all that matter. Wood will never stop walking people. So with that logic Pedro, Pedro never improved and never became the dominant pitcher that he WAS!!!!! It was all an evil plot by Bud Selig!!!!!

Pedro's Whip with Expos 1.15
Wood's WHIP with Cubs 1.19, how can you come within 2 walks of leading the league in walks and have a 1.19 WHIP???????

Grab the improving pitchers not the declining pitchers. I am not saying go grab the Rick Ankiels of the world. I am saying when choosing between two players of close to equal talent take the one that is on the rise not some old guy.

Last note: Yahoo rankings of the 4 pitchers based on last years stats, since you guys think you draft based on the past alone.
Drumroll please:
1. Mark Prior- The highest ranked SP
2. Kerry Wood- This surprised even me, Wood was the 5th highest rated pitcher.
3. Pedro- 6th highest and declining, am I the only one who watched him pitch last year?
4. Schilling- The 20th highest rated SP.

Are Yahoo rankings perfect, no, but they are arbitrary.
As for Prior being better than Pedro how about, more Wins despite playing on a team with an anemic offense and more K's!!!!???????

Cow OUT
The Cow
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1754
Joined: 12 May 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Eating refried beans

Postby Erboes » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:49 pm

Cow,

A good rule of thumb in any fantasy baseball argument is not to use Yahoo rankings. If you do you automatically lose any debate you are in because they are so ridiculously off-base that it makes you think they are done by a mafia accountant.
Erboes
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1433
Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Zany

Postby Madison » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:51 pm

The Cow wrote:Pedro's Whip with Expos 1.15
Wood's WHIP with Cubs 1.19, how can you come within 2 walks of leading the league in walks and have a 1.19 WHIP???????


The amount of innings that he threw plus very few hits allowed. That's how.

The Cow wrote:Yahoo rankings


Are worthless.

Use Yahoo for research, but the rankings are not worth chit. Lol. :-b
Yes doctor, I am sick.
Sick of those who are spineless.
Sick of those who feel self-entitled.
Sick of those who are hypocrites.
Yes doctor, an army is forming.
Yes doctor, there will be a war.
Yes doctor, there will be blood.....
Madison
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
ExecutiveEditorCafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe SpotterInnovative MemberCafe MusketeerPick 3 ChampionMatchup Meltdown SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 53856
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Taking Souls...

PreviousNext

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Imeldapync and 9 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Tuesday, Sep. 30
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Oakland at Kansas City
(8:07 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact